Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Juniper Exam JN0-664 Topic 1 Question 40 Discussion

Actual exam question for Juniper's JN0-664 exam
Question #: 40
Topic #: 1
[All JN0-664 Questions]

Exhibit

R2 is receiving the same route from R1 and R3. You must ensure that you can load balance traffic for that route.

Referring to the exhibit, which configuration change will allow load balancing?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, D, E

Junos platforms use different mechanisms to evaluate incoming traffic for CoS purposes, such as:

Behavior aggregate classifiers: These classifiers use a single field in a packet header to classify traffic into different forwarding classes and loss priorities based on predefined or user-defined values.

Fixed classifiers: These classifiers use a fixed field in a packet header to classify traffic into different forwarding classes and loss priorities based on predefined values.

Multifield classifiers: These classifiers use multiple fields in a packet header to classify traffic into different forwarding classes and loss priorities based on user-defined values and filters.

Rewrite rules and traffic shapers are not used to evaluate incoming traffic for CoS purposes, but rather to modify or shape outgoing traffic based on CoS policies.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Mitsue
18 days ago
Hmm, C seems like the clear winner here. Configuring multipath multiple-as is the only way to actually load balance the traffic across the two BGP sessions. Unless R1 and R3 are trying to pull a fast one on us, that is.
upvoted 0 times
Darrel
1 days ago
I agree, C is the best option for load balancing.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Josefa
1 months ago
I'm feeling confident about C. The other options just don't seem to address the requirement for load balancing the route. Although, I do wonder if R1 and R3 are secretly rooting for me to pick the wrong answer...
upvoted 0 times
R1 and R3 might be trying to trick us, but I still believe C is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ivette
23 days ago
I think C is the right choice too. It seems like the most logical option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cheryll
1 months ago
Haha, I bet the answer is C because the question said 'load balance' and that's the only option that mentions multipath. Maybe R1 and R3 are trying to send me on a wild goose chase with those other answers!
upvoted 0 times
...
Annmarie
1 months ago
I was leaning towards B, but C makes more sense since the question specifically mentions load balancing. Prepending the route would just make it less preferred, not actually load balance it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Krissy
2 months ago
Hmm, that makes sense too. It's important to consider load balancing in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kyoko
2 months ago
I think the correct answer is C. Configuring the multipath multiple-as parameter under the global BGP configuration would allow load balancing for the route received from R1 and R3.
upvoted 0 times
Leontine
12 days ago
Thanks for the reminder, I'll verify the configuration before implementing it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denise
21 days ago
Make sure to double check the configuration to ensure proper load balancing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melissa
22 days ago
I agree, that would enable load balancing for the route received from R1 and R3.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joseph
24 days ago
Configuring the multipath multiple-as parameter under the global BGP configuration would be the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Laquanda
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is C) Configure the multipath multiple-as parameter under the global BGP configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Krissy
2 months ago
I think the answer is A) Configure the multipath parameter under the global BGP configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel