Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Juniper JN0-664 Exam - Topic 1 Question 40 Discussion

ExhibitR2 is receiving the same route from R1 and R3. You must ensure that you can load balance traffic for that route.Referring to the exhibit, which configuration change will allow load balancing?
B) Apply the prepend policy as an import policy under group R1. and D) Apply the prepend policy as an import policy under group R3.
A) Configure the multipath parameter under the global BGP configuration.
C) Configure the multipath multiple-as parameter under the global BGP configuration.

Juniper JN0-664 Exam - Topic 1 Question 40 Discussion

Actual exam question for Juniper's JN0-664 exam
Question #: 40
Topic #: 1
[All JN0-664 Questions]

Exhibit

R2 is receiving the same route from R1 and R3. You must ensure that you can load balance traffic for that route.

Referring to the exhibit, which configuration change will allow load balancing?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, D, E

Junos platforms use different mechanisms to evaluate incoming traffic for CoS purposes, such as:

Behavior aggregate classifiers: These classifiers use a single field in a packet header to classify traffic into different forwarding classes and loss priorities based on predefined or user-defined values.

Fixed classifiers: These classifiers use a fixed field in a packet header to classify traffic into different forwarding classes and loss priorities based on predefined values.

Multifield classifiers: These classifiers use multiple fields in a packet header to classify traffic into different forwarding classes and loss priorities based on user-defined values and filters.

Rewrite rules and traffic shapers are not used to evaluate incoming traffic for CoS purposes, but rather to modify or shape outgoing traffic based on CoS policies.


by Alona at Nov 14, 2024, 03:21 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium JN0-664 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
King
7 months ago
I agree with C, but I’m curious about the impact on routing!
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodrigo
8 months ago
Wait, can you really load balance with just prepending? Sounds off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacquelyne
8 months ago
Definitely going with C, it’s the standard for multiple AS!
upvoted 0 times
...
Graham
8 months ago
I think A could work too, but not sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audra
8 months ago
Option C is the way to go for multipath!
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
9 months ago
I feel like I should go with option C since it mentions multiple-as, but I can't shake the feeling that I might be overthinking it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Taryn
9 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the differences between the multipath and multiple-as options. I think I might have seen a question that emphasized using multiple-as for load balancing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurena
9 months ago
This question feels familiar! I think I practiced a similar one where we had to balance routes from multiple peers. I wonder if the prepend policy could actually help here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malinda
9 months ago
I remember studying BGP multipath configurations, but I'm not sure if it's just the multipath parameter or if I need to consider multiple-as as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jarvis
9 months ago
Prepending the route under the import policy won't work here. That would just make one of the paths less preferred, not enable load balancing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felix
9 months ago
Okay, I think I've got it. The key is to configure the multipath parameter under the global BGP configuration to enable load balancing for that route.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorian
9 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the wording here. I'll need to re-read the question and exhibit a few times to make sure I understand what they're asking.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shayne
9 months ago
This looks like a tricky BGP configuration question. I'll need to think through the options carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitsue
1 year ago
Hmm, C seems like the clear winner here. Configuring multipath multiple-as is the only way to actually load balance the traffic across the two BGP sessions. Unless R1 and R3 are trying to pull a fast one on us, that is.
upvoted 0 times
Veronika
1 year ago
Yeah, configuring multipath multiple-as seems like the right move.
upvoted 0 times
...
Twana
1 year ago
I think C is the most logical choice as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darrel
1 year ago
I agree, C is the best option for load balancing.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Josefa
1 year ago
I'm feeling confident about C. The other options just don't seem to address the requirement for load balancing the route. Although, I do wonder if R1 and R3 are secretly rooting for me to pick the wrong answer...
upvoted 0 times
Haydee
1 year ago
Let's go with C then. It's our best shot at achieving load balancing for that route.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reena
1 year ago
R1 and R3 might be trying to trick us, but I still believe C is the best solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Renea
1 year ago
Let's go with C and hope for the best. It seems like the most appropriate solution for load balancing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Esteban
1 year ago
I think C is the correct choice too. It seems like the most logical option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ma
1 year ago
R1 and R3 might be trying to trick us, but I still believe C is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ivette
1 year ago
I think C is the right choice too. It seems like the most logical option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cheryll
1 year ago
Haha, I bet the answer is C because the question said 'load balance' and that's the only option that mentions multipath. Maybe R1 and R3 are trying to send me on a wild goose chase with those other answers!
upvoted 0 times
...
Annmarie
1 year ago
I was leaning towards B, but C makes more sense since the question specifically mentions load balancing. Prepending the route would just make it less preferred, not actually load balance it.
upvoted 0 times
Jeniffer
1 year ago
Definitely, multipath multiple-as would help distribute the traffic across multiple paths.
upvoted 0 times
...
Whitney
1 year ago
I agree, C seems like the correct choice for load balancing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dahlia
1 year ago
C) Configure the multipath multiple-as parameter under the global BGP configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Regenia
1 year ago
A) Configure the multipath parameter under the global BGP configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Krissy
1 year ago
Hmm, that makes sense too. It's important to consider load balancing in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kyoko
1 year ago
I think the correct answer is C. Configuring the multipath multiple-as parameter under the global BGP configuration would allow load balancing for the route received from R1 and R3.
upvoted 0 times
Leontine
1 year ago
Thanks for the reminder, I'll verify the configuration before implementing it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denise
1 year ago
Make sure to double check the configuration to ensure proper load balancing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melissa
1 year ago
I agree, that would enable load balancing for the route received from R1 and R3.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joseph
1 year ago
Configuring the multipath multiple-as parameter under the global BGP configuration would be the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Laquanda
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is C) Configure the multipath multiple-as parameter under the global BGP configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Krissy
1 year ago
I think the answer is A) Configure the multipath parameter under the global BGP configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel