Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Juniper JN0-664 Exam - Topic 1 Question 4 Discussion

ExhibitA network designer would like to create a summary route as shown in the exhibit, but the configuration is not working.Which three configuration changes will create a summary route? (Choose three.)
B) delete policy-options policy-statement leak-v6 term DC-routes from route-filter 2001: db9 :a: fa00 : :/6l longer and C) set policy---options policy-statement leak-v term DC---routes from route-filter 2001:db9:a:faOO::/61 exact and D) delete protocols isis export summary-v6
A) set policy-options policy-statement leak-v6 term DC-routes then reject
E) set protocols isis import summary-v6

Juniper JN0-664 Exam - Topic 1 Question 4 Discussion

Actual exam question for Juniper's JN0-664 exam
Question #: 4
Topic #: 1
[All JN0-664 Questions]

Exhibit

A network designer would like to create a summary route as shown in the exhibit, but the configuration is not working.

Which three configuration changes will create a summary route? (Choose three.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, C, D

To create a summary route for IS-IS, you need to configure a policy statement that matches the prefixes to be summarized and sets the next-hop to discard. You also need to configure a summary-address statement under the IS-IS protocol hierarchy that references the policy statement. In this case, the policy statement leak-v6 is trying to match the prefix 2001:db9:a:fa00::/61 exactly, but this prefix is not advertised by any router in the network. Therefore, no summary route is created. To fix this, you need to delete the longer keyword from the route-filter term and change the prefix length to /61 exact. This will match any prefix that falls within the /61 range. You also need to delete the export statement under protocols isis, because this will export all routes that match the policy statement to other IS-IS routers, which is not desired for a summary route.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Dominga
10 months ago
I’m not sure about E, isn’t that just adding complexity?
upvoted 0 times
...
Denae
10 months ago
C looks good too, but what about D?
upvoted 0 times
...
Johana
10 months ago
Wait, can you really just delete the export? Sounds risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Flo
10 months ago
Agree, B seems essential!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tarra
10 months ago
I think option B is definitely needed for the summary route.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glen
11 months ago
I feel like deleting the export summary-v6 could be a good option, but I’m not entirely confident about how it interacts with the import settings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elke
11 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to manipulate policy statements, but I can't remember if rejecting terms is always necessary.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leanna
11 months ago
I think option E about setting the protocols for ISIS import might be crucial for creating the summary route, but I can't recall the exact syntax.
upvoted 0 times
...
Britt
11 months ago
I remember we discussed summary routes in class, but I'm not sure if deleting the route-filter is the right move.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kanisha
11 months ago
Wait, I'm a bit confused. Is it just about monopolies having higher costs, or is there more to it than that? I'll need to review my notes to make sure I understand the full explanation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sanjuana
11 months ago
Cultural backgrounds are definitely the most important factor here. A one-size-fits-all approach won't work for a diverse global workforce.
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
11 months ago
I like the idea of using a code stage interface in option C. That could give me more flexibility to interact with the application.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel