Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Juniper Exam JN0-480 Topic 1 Question 11 Discussion

Actual exam question for Juniper's JN0-480 exam
Question #: 11
Topic #: 1
[All JN0-480 Questions]

A member of your organization made changes to a predefined interface map using Juniper Apstra.

Which two statements are correct in this scenario? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

According to the Juniper documentation1, a routing zone is an L3 domain, the unit of tenancy in multi-tenant networks. You create routing zones for tenants to isolate their IP traffic from one another, thus enabling tenants to re-use IP subnets. In addition to being in its own VRF, each routing zone can be assigned its own DHCP relay server and external system connections. You can create one or more virtual networks within a routing zone, which means a tenant can stretch its L2 applications across multiple racks within its routing zone. For virtual networks with Layer 3 SVI, the SVI is associated with a Virtual Routing and Forwarding (VRF) instance for each routing zone isolating the virtual network SVI from other virtual network SVIs in other routing zones. Therefore, the correct answer is D. A routing zone is used to enable the communication between two VNIs within a VRF. A routing zone is not used for L4-L7 inspection, securing routing protocols, or requiring firewalls. Those are not the purposes of a routing zone in Juniper Apstra software.Reference:Routing Zones


by Sommer at Apr 26, 2024, 11:49 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium JN0-480 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Thurman
2 months ago
I'm going with A and D. Gotta keep those interface maps up-to-date, but don't want to break the existing blueprints. Apstra, keeping us on our toes!
upvoted 0 times
Vincenza
1 months ago
Yes, it's crucial to be careful with changes to predefined interface maps. A and D are the right choices to ensure everything runs smoothly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lili
1 months ago
Apstra definitely keeps us on our toes with these changes to interface maps. It's good to know that anomalies will be raised for any global catalog changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glendora
1 months ago
I agree, A and D are the correct statements. It's important to keep the interface maps updated without affecting existing blueprints.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Maile
3 months ago
I'm not sure about B and C. Can someone explain why changes to predefined interface maps won't impact the Apstra software?
upvoted 0 times
...
Nana
3 months ago
I agree with Rikki. Changes in the global catalog won't affect imported interface maps, and anomalies will be raised for changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rikki
3 months ago
I think the correct statements are A and D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashlyn
3 months ago
I'm not sure about B and C. Can someone explain why changes to predefined interface maps won't impact the software?
upvoted 0 times
...
Bev
3 months ago
Hah, I bet the Apstra developers wish they could just discard any changes we make! But alas, option B is clearly incorrect.
upvoted 0 times
Refugia
2 months ago
Regenia: So, the correct statements are A and D then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annice
2 months ago
User 3: Changes to interface maps in the global catalog may raise anomalies that need to be addressed later.
upvoted 0 times
...
Regenia
2 months ago
User 2: Yeah, changes made to predefined interface maps will not be discarded when Apstra is upgraded.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cordelia
2 months ago
User 2: That's right. Changes to interface maps in the global catalog will raise anomalies that may need to be addressed at the next commit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelina
3 months ago
User 1: I agree, option B is definitely wrong.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janine
3 months ago
User 1: Yeah, option B is definitely wrong. Changes to predefined interface maps are not discarded when Apstra is upgraded.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Osvaldo
3 months ago
I agree with Latanya. Changes to interface maps in the global catalog do not affect imported maps, and anomalies may be raised.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latanya
3 months ago
I think the correct statements are A and D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marla
3 months ago
I'm not sure about B, but C seems definitely wrong. Changes to the interface maps will impact the Apstra software, whether we like it or not.
upvoted 0 times
...
Trinidad
3 months ago
A and D seem like the correct answers here. Changes to the global catalog won't affect existing blueprints, but they could raise anomalies that need to be addressed.
upvoted 0 times
Theola
2 months ago
User 4: Agreed, staying informed about the impact of changes is crucial for smooth operations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amira
2 months ago
User 3: It's important to be aware of potential issues when making changes to predefined interface maps.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonna
2 months ago
User 2: Yes, changes in global catalog can raise anomalies that need to be addressed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Trinidad
2 months ago
User 1: A and D are correct. Changes to global catalog won't affect existing blueprints.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel