Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Juniper Exam JN0-335 Topic 7 Question 30 Discussion

Actual exam question for Juniper's JN0-335 exam
Question #: 30
Topic #: 7
[All JN0-335 Questions]

Your company is using the Juniper ATP Cloud free model. The current inspection profile is set at 10 MB You are asked to configure ATP Cloud so that executable files up to 30 MB can be scanned while at the same time minimizing the change in scan time for other file types.

Which configuration should you use in this scenario?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

The service that you would implement at your edge device to prioritize VoIP traffic in this scenario is AppQoS. AppQoS is a feature that enables you to allocate bandwidth and prioritize traffic based on application signatures or custom rules. AppQoS can enhance the quality of service and experience for critical or latency-sensitive applications, such as VoIP. You can configure AppQoS policies to assign different classes of service (CoS) values or queue numbers to different applications or traffic flows. You can also define bandwidth limits, guarantees, or bursts for each class or queue.Reference:= [Application Quality of Service Overview], [Configuring Application Quality of Service]


Contribute your Thoughts:

Aileen
16 days ago
I'm gonna have to go with option D. Increasing the scan limit for just the executable files is the smart move here. After all, who needs to scan 30 MB of cat photos, am I right? *winks*
upvoted 0 times
...
Hildred
17 days ago
Option A is the way to go, my friend. Creating a custom profile using the CLI gives you that extra level of control and flexibility. It's like the difference between driving a sports car and a minivan - sure, the minivan gets the job done, but the sports car is just more fun!
upvoted 0 times
Chun
3 days ago
A) Use the CLI to create a custom profile and increase the scan limit.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Elina
20 days ago
Option C sounds good to me. Using the CLI to change the default profile is probably more secure and reliable than messing with the UI. Plus, I'm a command-line kind of guy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Domitila
25 days ago
I'm leaning towards option B. Changing the default profile to increase the scan limit for all files to 30 MB seems simpler, and it'll save me from having to create a custom profile.
upvoted 0 times
Isreal
2 days ago
I agree, changing the default profile seems like the easiest solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Xochitl
4 days ago
I think option B is the way to go. It's simpler and saves time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
17 days ago
Let's go with option B then, it's simpler and saves time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenna
19 days ago
I agree, changing the default profile seems like the most straightforward option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maxima
21 days ago
Option B sounds like the easiest solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Aliza
2 months ago
Hmm, I think option D is the way to go. Using the UI to update a custom profile and increase the scan limit for just the executable files seems like the most targeted approach.
upvoted 0 times
Cruz
29 days ago
I think option D is the best solution too. It targets the specific files that need the scan limit increase.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bulah
1 months ago
I agree, option D seems like the most efficient choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Quinn
2 months ago
I'm not sure about using the CLI. Maybe we should consider using the ATP Cloud UI to update a custom profile instead.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tracie
2 months ago
I agree with Margurite. That way we can specifically target executable files without affecting other file types.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margurite
2 months ago
I think we should use the CLI to create a custom profile and increase the scan limit.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel