Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Juniper Exam JN0-335 Topic 7 Question 25 Discussion

Actual exam question for Juniper's JN0-335 exam
Question #: 25
Topic #: 7
[All JN0-335 Questions]

On an SRX Series firewall, what are two ways that Encrypted Traffic Insights assess the threat of the traffic? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

The service that you would implement at your edge device to prioritize VoIP traffic in this scenario is AppQoS. AppQoS is a feature that enables you to allocate bandwidth and prioritize traffic based on application signatures or custom rules. AppQoS can enhance the quality of service and experience for critical or latency-sensitive applications, such as VoIP. You can configure AppQoS policies to assign different classes of service (CoS) values or queue numbers to different applications or traffic flows. You can also define bandwidth limits, guarantees, or bursts for each class or queue.Reference:= [Application Quality of Service Overview], [Configuring Application Quality of Service]


Contribute your Thoughts:

Delisa
26 days ago
I'm torn between B and C, but I think D is a wild card that could really shake things up. Gotta keep those Encrypted Traffic Insights on their toes, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
Lelia
10 days ago
User 1: I think B and C are the ways Encrypted Traffic Insights assess the threat.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Natalie
1 months ago
I'm not sure about the answer. Can someone explain why C) It decrypts the data to validate the hash is not one of the ways?
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvia
1 months ago
I agree with Trinidad. I also believe that D) It reviews the timing and frequency of the connections is another way.
upvoted 0 times
...
Trinidad
1 months ago
I think the answer is B) It validates the certificates used.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorean
2 months ago
I'm not sure about B, but I think C is also important. Decrypting the data to validate the hash seems crucial for assessing the threat.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janna
2 months ago
Haha, decrypting the file in a sandbox? That's like trying to catch a ghost with a butterfly net. Gotta go with B and D, those seem like the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Van
29 days ago
User 2: Van is right, B and D are the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beula
1 months ago
User 1: Haha, decrypting the file in a sandbox? That's like trying to catch a ghost with a butterfly net.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nicolette
2 months ago
I agree with Lashawn. Validating certificates and reviewing timing and frequency of connections make sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kendra
2 months ago
I'm going with B and D as well. Decrypting the file in a sandbox sounds a bit overkill, and validating the hash seems unnecessary for this particular question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawn
2 months ago
I think the answer is B and D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilma
2 months ago
B and D seem like the most logical options here. Validating the certificates used and reviewing the timing and frequency of the connections would give insight into the potential threat of the encrypted traffic.
upvoted 0 times
Noelia
20 days ago
User 4: It decrypts the data to validate the hash.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deonna
29 days ago
User 3: It decrypts the file in a sandbox.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ollie
1 months ago
User 2: Agreed, validating certificates and reviewing connection timing can reveal a lot.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marica
1 months ago
User 1: I think B and D are the best options for assessing encrypted traffic threats.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel