Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Juniper Exam JN0-335 Topic 5 Question 21 Discussion

Actual exam question for Juniper's JN0-335 exam
Question #: 21
Topic #: 5
[All JN0-335 Questions]

Exhibit

Using the information from the exhibit, which statement is correct?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, D

A reth LAG is a redundant Ethernet link aggregation group that combines multiple physical interfaces into a single logical interface in a chassis cluster. A reth LAG provides load balancing and redundancy for traffic within or between redundancy groups. Two statements that are correct about a reth LAG are:

Links must have the same speed and duplex setting: To form a reth LAG, the physical interfaces must have the same speed and duplex setting. This ensures that the links can operate at the same capacity and avoid performance issues or errors.

You should have two or more interfaces: To create a reth LAG, you need to have at least two physical interfaces. One interface should be connected to node 0 and the other interface should be connected to node 1. You can also have more than two interfaces in a reth LAG for increased bandwidth and redundancy.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Isreal
1 months ago
Redundancy group 0 is down, so option D is the correct answer. Although, I have to say, the person who came up with option C must be living in a parallel universe where everything is just peachy.
upvoted 0 times
Anabel
8 days ago
Option C seems completely unrealistic in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catalina
16 days ago
Yeah, it's clear that redundancy group 0 is down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julieta
20 days ago
I agree, option D is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Erick
1 months ago
Option D is the way to go. Redundancy group 0 is clearly the one causing issues here. Although, I have to admit, I'm a little curious about what kind of 'control plane' they're talking about. Is this some kind of advanced networking stuff?
upvoted 0 times
Abel
9 days ago
User 2: I agree, it seems like that group is causing issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annabelle
21 days ago
User 1: Option D is correct. Redundancy group 0 is in an ineligible state.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Barrie
1 months ago
Haha, I bet the person who came up with option B has never even seen a real cluster before. Maybe they thought 'Node1' was the name of the control plane or something.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elvera
1 months ago
This is a no-brainer. Redundancy group 0 is the one that's in trouble, not Redundancy group 1. I guess some people just can't read a simple diagram.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ettie
1 months ago
Hmm, that's interesting. Can you explain why you think that?
upvoted 0 times
...
Aliza
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe B) Node1 is the active node for the control plane is the correct statement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Meghan
2 months ago
The exhibit clearly shows that Redundancy group 0 is in an ineligible state, so option D is correct. I don't understand how anyone could think Node1 is the active node for the control plane.
upvoted 0 times
Skye
21 days ago
Yeah, Node1 being the active node for the control plane doesn't make sense based on the exhibit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darrel
30 days ago
I agree, Redundancy group 0 is definitely in an ineligible state.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ettie
2 months ago
I think the correct statement is D) Redundancy group 0 is in an ineligible state.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel