Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Juniper Exam JN0-335 Topic 3 Question 46 Discussion

Actual exam question for Juniper's JN0-335 exam
Question #: 46
Topic #: 3
[All JN0-335 Questions]

Click the Exhibit button.

You are asked to create a security policy that will automatically add infected hosts to the infected hosts feed and block further communication through the SRX Series device.

What needs to be added to this configuration to complete this task?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

The logging parameter that will provide the function of showing tabular data for operational mode commands is count. The count parameter displays the number of packets and bytes that match a security policy and the action taken by the policy. The count parameter can be used with the show security policies hit-count command to display the policy counters in a tabular format. The count parameter can also be used with the show security flow session command to display the session counters in a tabular format.Reference:=show security policies hit-count,show security flow session


by Virgina at Feb 12, 2025, 05:13 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium JN0-335 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Rosalind
24 days ago
Aha! I've got it. B is the answer, no doubt. Adding an action to the permit policy will really put those infected hosts in their place. It's like a security dance, you know? Gotta lead with the right step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelle
30 days ago
This is a tricky one, but I'm going with C. Logging the permit portion is key to tracking those pesky infected hosts. Gotta keep an eye on the traffic, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Quiana
17 days ago
A) Add a security intelligence policy to the permit portion of the security policy.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alishia
1 months ago
D is the way to go, my friend. A match rule with an appropriate threat level will do the trick. Gotta keep those infected hosts at bay, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Irving
8 days ago
B) Add an action to the permit portion of the security policy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melina
16 days ago
A) Add a security intelligence policy to the permit portion of the security policy.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cassi
2 months ago
Hmm, I think the answer is B. Adding an action to the permit portion of the security policy seems like the right way to automatically block infected hosts. Simple and straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
Glory
27 days ago
User 2: Agreed, adding an action to the permit portion of the security policy is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louvenia
1 months ago
User 1: I think the answer is B too. It makes sense to add an action to block infected hosts.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gwenn
2 months ago
But shouldn't we also add a security intelligence policy to the permit portion for better protection?
upvoted 0 times
...
Alana
2 months ago
I agree with Leonora, adding a match rule will help block infected hosts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonora
2 months ago
I think we need to add a match rule with an appropriate threat level.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel