Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Juniper JN0-281 Exam - Topic 2 Question 20 Discussion

Posted by Felicitas on May 03, 2026 at 09:29 PM

What is the purpose of implementing a link aggregation group LAG in a network?

Suggested Answer: A

A link aggregation group combines multiple physical Ethernet interfaces into one logical link layer interface, called an aggregated Ethernet interface on Junos. The primary purpose is to improve availability and increase usable bandwidth between two devices without changing the logical topology. If one member link fails, the aggregate can remain up and continue forwarding traffic over the remaining active members, providing redundancy at the link layer. This is especially valuable in data center designs where loss of a single optic or cable should not interrupt server connectivity, leaf to spine uplinks, or connections to service appliances.

LAG also enables load balancing. Instead of forcing all traffic over one physical link, the forwarding plane distributes flows across member links using a hashing algorithm. This allows the aggregate to use the sum of member bandwidth for multiple concurrent flows while keeping packets for a given flow in order. In leaf spine fabrics, this complements ECMP at Layer 3 by delivering parallelism both at the routed path level and within a single adjacency when multiple physical links exist.

LAG does not encrypt traffic. Encryption is provided by separate security features and protocols. It also does not increase the speed of a single physical interface; rather, it increases the total capacity of the logical bundle across multiple links. Finally, it does not assign IP addresses, which is the role of services like DHCP, not link aggregation.


Get Premium JN0-281 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
24 comments · newest first
MI
Micheline 2 days ago
I feel A covers both redundancy and load balancing well.
ST
Stephen 8 days ago
Definitely A! It improves reliability and performance.
CO
Corinne 13 days ago
D is irrelevant. LAG is about link management, not IPs.
AI
Ailene 18 days ago
C is misleading. LAG doesn’t speed up a single link.
AN
An 23 days ago
B seems off. Encryption isn't the main goal here.
CO
Cordell 28 days ago
Agreed! Load balancing helps with traffic too.
GE
Genevieve 1 month ago
I think A is the best choice. Redundancy is key!
JA
Jaime 1 month ago
Yes! A is definitely the right answer for efficiency.
EV
Evangelina 1 month ago
I feel confident about A. It’s a common practice in networks.
KA
Karl 2 months ago
A covers both redundancy and load balancing well.
RE
Reena 2 months ago
D is irrelevant. IP assignment isn’t related to LAG.
KE
Kelvin 2 months ago
C is misleading. It’s about multiple links, not one.
SK
Skye 2 months ago
B seems off. Encryption isn’t the main goal here.
ED
Edward 2 months ago
Totally agree! Load balancing helps too.
TA
Tandra 2 months ago
I think A is the best choice. Redundancy is key!
AL
Alyce 3 months ago
D) sounds interesting, but it’s not related to LAG at all!
LA
Lavonne 3 months ago
B) is totally off base, LAG doesn’t encrypt anything.
AB
Abel 3 months ago
Wait, can LAG really increase speed? I thought it just combined links.
MA
Margurite 3 months ago
Totally agree, redundancy and load balancing are key!
RI
Richelle 3 months ago
A) is definitely the right answer!
ER
Erick 4 months ago
I’m confused because I thought LAGs could also help with speed, but I guess that’s not the main purpose?
CE
Cecilia 5 months ago
I practiced a question like this before, and I believe LAGs are definitely about managing multiple links, which sounds like A again.
FA
Fannie 5 months ago
I’m not entirely sure, but I remember something about LAGs helping with bandwidth. Is that related to option C?
SH
Sharan 5 months ago
I think link aggregation is mainly about redundancy and load balancing, so I’d lean towards option A.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel