New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ISTQB CTFL-Foundation Exam - Topic 1 Question 14 Discussion

Actual exam question for ISTQB's CTFL-Foundation exam
Question #: 14
Topic #: 1
[All CTFL-Foundation Questions]

Refer to the Exhibit.

The decision table above shows a company's fuel expenses structure.

Which of the following Test Cases based on the decision table are Valid?

Test Case 1:

An employee who is not a car or motorcycle driver attempts to claim fuel expenses. Expected result: Expense claim not allowed.

Test Case 2:

An employee who drives a 1700cc diesel car attempts to claim fuel expenses. Expected result: Expense claim accepted at band C.

Test Case 3:

An employee who rides a motorcycle attempts to claim fuel expenses. Expected result: Expense claim accepted at band A.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Barney
3 months ago
I'm surprised Test Case 1 is even a question, seems obvious!
upvoted 0 times
...
Cyndy
3 months ago
Test Case 3 is valid for sure, motorcycles get band A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sol
3 months ago
Wait, how can Test Case 2 be valid? Isn't 1700cc too high for band C?
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
4 months ago
I agree, Test Case 1 should not be valid!
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherri
4 months ago
Test Case 1 is definitely invalid.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yoko
4 months ago
I feel like Test Case 1 is invalid for sure, but I can't recall if Test Case 2 is valid or not. I hope I remember the bands correctly!
upvoted 0 times
...
Pa
4 months ago
I'm a bit confused about the cc classification for Test Case 2. Is 1700cc really in band C? I thought it might be different.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elliot
4 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question where we had to determine valid claims based on vehicle types. I feel like Test Case 3 should be valid since motorcycles are mentioned in the table.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pilar
5 months ago
I think Test Case 1 is definitely invalid since the employee isn't a driver, but I'm not sure about Test Case 2.
upvoted 0 times
...
Harrison
5 months ago
This is a good opportunity to demonstrate my understanding of decision tables. I feel confident I can analyze these test cases correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherita
5 months ago
No problem, I've got this. I'll methodically go through each test case and compare it to the decision table to figure out which ones are valid.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annelle
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording of the question. Do I need to consider anything beyond just checking the test cases against the decision table?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rhea
5 months ago
Hmm, this seems straightforward. I just need to match the details of each test case to the conditions in the decision table and determine if they are valid or not.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thaddeus
5 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. The decision table shows the fuel expense structure, so I need to carefully analyze each test case against the criteria in the table.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleta
5 months ago
Okay, I've got a good handle on wireless security, so I think I can tackle this. Let me review the choices and pick the one that best addresses the biggest concern.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ciara
5 months ago
I remember learning about IGMP in class, but I'm drawing a blank on the specifics right now. I'll have to review my notes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashanti
5 months ago
This one seems pretty straightforward. I think the answer is option C, "ls -l", since that just lists the file names without any additional information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alease
5 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the different options carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karl
2 years ago
I'm voting for C. All three test cases seem to be in line with the decision table. Unless the company has a secret 'No Fuel Expenses for Employees' policy, of course.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sanda
2 years ago
This decision table is a work of art! I bet the person who made it has a PhD in Fuel Expense Management. Very thorough and precise.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolf
2 years ago
I'm not sure about Test Case 1. Shouldn't the company at least allow some kind of claim, even if it's not the full amount? Seems a bit harsh to completely disallow it.
upvoted 0 times
Venita
2 years ago
Yeah, it would be more fair to allow some kind of claim, even if it's not the full amount.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jestine
2 years ago
I agree, it does seem a bit harsh. Maybe the company should reconsider their policy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aileen
2 years ago
Test Case 2 is valid because the employee drives a 1700cc diesel car, which falls under band C for expense claims.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tammy
2 years ago
I agree, it does seem a bit harsh. But that's how the decision table is structured.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonard
2 years ago
Test Case 1 seems too strict. Maybe they should allow a partial claim instead of none at all.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delfina
2 years ago
Test Case 1 is invalid because the company does not allow any fuel expense claim for employees who are not car or motorcycle drivers.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sharan
2 years ago
Test Case 2 is definitely valid. Why would the company not accept fuel expenses for a diesel car? That's just common sense.
upvoted 0 times
Ocie
2 years ago
Yeah, Test Case 2 is definitely valid. The company should accept fuel expenses for a diesel car.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristal
2 years ago
I agree, Test Case 2 is valid. It makes sense to accept fuel expenses for a diesel car.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlesetta
2 years ago
Yeah, Test Case 2 is definitely valid. The company should accept expenses for a diesel car.
upvoted 0 times
...
Freida
2 years ago
I agree, Test Case 2 is valid. It makes sense to accept fuel expenses for a diesel car.
upvoted 0 times
...
Patti
2 years ago
I agree, Test Case 2 is valid because it falls under band C in the decision table.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dusti
2 years ago
Test Case 2 is definitely valid. Why would the company not accept fuel expenses for a diesel car? That's just common sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel