Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ISTQB Exam CTFL-Foundation Topic 1 Question 14 Discussion

Actual exam question for ISTQB's CTFL-Foundation exam
Question #: 14
Topic #: 1
[All CTFL-Foundation Questions]

Refer to the Exhibit.

The decision table above shows a company's fuel expenses structure.

Which of the following Test Cases based on the decision table are Valid?

Test Case 1:

An employee who is not a car or motorcycle driver attempts to claim fuel expenses. Expected result: Expense claim not allowed.

Test Case 2:

An employee who drives a 1700cc diesel car attempts to claim fuel expenses. Expected result: Expense claim accepted at band C.

Test Case 3:

An employee who rides a motorcycle attempts to claim fuel expenses. Expected result: Expense claim accepted at band A.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by An at May 23, 2024, 02:24 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CTFL-Foundation Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Karl
1 years ago
I'm voting for C. All three test cases seem to be in line with the decision table. Unless the company has a secret 'No Fuel Expenses for Employees' policy, of course.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sanda
1 years ago
This decision table is a work of art! I bet the person who made it has a PhD in Fuel Expense Management. Very thorough and precise.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolf
1 years ago
I'm not sure about Test Case 1. Shouldn't the company at least allow some kind of claim, even if it's not the full amount? Seems a bit harsh to completely disallow it.
upvoted 0 times
Venita
1 years ago
Yeah, it would be more fair to allow some kind of claim, even if it's not the full amount.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jestine
1 years ago
I agree, it does seem a bit harsh. Maybe the company should reconsider their policy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aileen
1 years ago
Test Case 2 is valid because the employee drives a 1700cc diesel car, which falls under band C for expense claims.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tammy
1 years ago
I agree, it does seem a bit harsh. But that's how the decision table is structured.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonard
1 years ago
Test Case 1 seems too strict. Maybe they should allow a partial claim instead of none at all.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delfina
1 years ago
Test Case 1 is invalid because the company does not allow any fuel expense claim for employees who are not car or motorcycle drivers.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sharan
1 years ago
Test Case 2 is definitely valid. Why would the company not accept fuel expenses for a diesel car? That's just common sense.
upvoted 0 times
Ocie
1 years ago
Yeah, Test Case 2 is definitely valid. The company should accept fuel expenses for a diesel car.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristal
1 years ago
I agree, Test Case 2 is valid. It makes sense to accept fuel expenses for a diesel car.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlesetta
1 years ago
Yeah, Test Case 2 is definitely valid. The company should accept expenses for a diesel car.
upvoted 0 times
...
Freida
1 years ago
I agree, Test Case 2 is valid. It makes sense to accept fuel expenses for a diesel car.
upvoted 0 times
...
Patti
1 years ago
I agree, Test Case 2 is valid because it falls under band C in the decision table.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dusti
1 years ago
Test Case 2 is definitely valid. Why would the company not accept fuel expenses for a diesel car? That's just common sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel