Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ISTQB Exam CTFL-Foundation Topic 1 Question 14 Discussion

Actual exam question for ISTQB's CTFL-Foundation exam
Question #: 14
Topic #: 1
[All CTFL-Foundation Questions]

Refer to the Exhibit.

The decision table above shows a company's fuel expenses structure.

Which of the following Test Cases based on the decision table are Valid?

Test Case 1:

An employee who is not a car or motorcycle driver attempts to claim fuel expenses. Expected result: Expense claim not allowed.

Test Case 2:

An employee who drives a 1700cc diesel car attempts to claim fuel expenses. Expected result: Expense claim accepted at band C.

Test Case 3:

An employee who rides a motorcycle attempts to claim fuel expenses. Expected result: Expense claim accepted at band A.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by An at May 23, 2024, 02:24 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CTFL-Foundation Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Karl
10 months ago
I'm voting for C. All three test cases seem to be in line with the decision table. Unless the company has a secret 'No Fuel Expenses for Employees' policy, of course.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sanda
10 months ago
This decision table is a work of art! I bet the person who made it has a PhD in Fuel Expense Management. Very thorough and precise.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolf
10 months ago
I'm not sure about Test Case 1. Shouldn't the company at least allow some kind of claim, even if it's not the full amount? Seems a bit harsh to completely disallow it.
upvoted 0 times
Venita
9 months ago
Yeah, it would be more fair to allow some kind of claim, even if it's not the full amount.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jestine
10 months ago
I agree, it does seem a bit harsh. Maybe the company should reconsider their policy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aileen
10 months ago
Test Case 2 is valid because the employee drives a 1700cc diesel car, which falls under band C for expense claims.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tammy
10 months ago
I agree, it does seem a bit harsh. But that's how the decision table is structured.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonard
10 months ago
Test Case 1 seems too strict. Maybe they should allow a partial claim instead of none at all.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delfina
10 months ago
Test Case 1 is invalid because the company does not allow any fuel expense claim for employees who are not car or motorcycle drivers.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sharan
11 months ago
Test Case 2 is definitely valid. Why would the company not accept fuel expenses for a diesel car? That's just common sense.
upvoted 0 times
Ocie
10 months ago
Yeah, Test Case 2 is definitely valid. The company should accept fuel expenses for a diesel car.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristal
10 months ago
I agree, Test Case 2 is valid. It makes sense to accept fuel expenses for a diesel car.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlesetta
10 months ago
Yeah, Test Case 2 is definitely valid. The company should accept expenses for a diesel car.
upvoted 0 times
...
Freida
10 months ago
I agree, Test Case 2 is valid. It makes sense to accept fuel expenses for a diesel car.
upvoted 0 times
...
Patti
10 months ago
I agree, Test Case 2 is valid because it falls under band C in the decision table.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dusti
10 months ago
Test Case 2 is definitely valid. Why would the company not accept fuel expenses for a diesel car? That's just common sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel