Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ISTQB CTFL-Foundation Exam - Topic 1 Question 14 Discussion

Posted by An on May 23, 2024 at 02:24 AM

Refer to the Exhibit.

The decision table above shows a company's fuel expenses structure.

Which of the following Test Cases based on the decision table are Valid?

Test Case 1:

An employee who is not a car or motorcycle driver attempts to claim fuel expenses. Expected result: Expense claim not allowed.

Test Case 2:

An employee who drives a 1700cc diesel car attempts to claim fuel expenses. Expected result: Expense claim accepted at band C.

Test Case 3:

An employee who rides a motorcycle attempts to claim fuel expenses. Expected result: Expense claim accepted at band A.

Suggested Answer: C

Get Premium CTFL-Foundation Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
34 comments · newest first
BA
Barney 10 months ago
I'm surprised Test Case 1 is even a question, seems obvious!
CY
Cyndy 11 months ago
Test Case 3 is valid for sure, motorcycles get band A.
SO
Sol 11 months ago
Wait, how can Test Case 2 be valid? Isn't 1700cc too high for band C?
ST
Stephaine 11 months ago
I agree, Test Case 1 should not be valid!
CH
Cherri 11 months ago
Test Case 1 is definitely invalid.
YO
Yoko 12 months ago
I feel like Test Case 1 is invalid for sure, but I can't recall if Test Case 2 is valid or not. I hope I remember the bands correctly!
PA
Pa 12 months ago
I'm a bit confused about the cc classification for Test Case 2. Is 1700cc really in band C? I thought it might be different.
EL
Elliot 12 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question where we had to determine valid claims based on vehicle types. I feel like Test Case 3 should be valid since motorcycles are mentioned in the table.
PI
Pilar 1 year ago
I think Test Case 1 is definitely invalid since the employee isn't a driver, but I'm not sure about Test Case 2.
HA
Harrison 1 year ago
This is a good opportunity to demonstrate my understanding of decision tables. I feel confident I can analyze these test cases correctly.
SH
Sherita 1 year ago
No problem, I've got this. I'll methodically go through each test case and compare it to the decision table to figure out which ones are valid.
AN
Annelle 1 year ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording of the question. Do I need to consider anything beyond just checking the test cases against the decision table?
RH
Rhea 1 year ago
Hmm, this seems straightforward. I just need to match the details of each test case to the conditions in the decision table and determine if they are valid or not.
TH
Thaddeus 1 year ago
Okay, let me think this through. The decision table shows the fuel expense structure, so I need to carefully analyze each test case against the criteria in the table.
AL
Aleta 1 year ago
Okay, I've got a good handle on wireless security, so I think I can tackle this. Let me review the choices and pick the one that best addresses the biggest concern.
CI
Ciara 1 year ago
I remember learning about IGMP in class, but I'm drawing a blank on the specifics right now. I'll have to review my notes.
AS
Ashanti 1 year ago
This one seems pretty straightforward. I think the answer is option C, "ls -l", since that just lists the file names without any additional information.
AL
Alease 1 year ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the different options carefully.
KA
Karl 2 years ago
I'm voting for C. All three test cases seem to be in line with the decision table. Unless the company has a secret 'No Fuel Expenses for Employees' policy, of course.
SA
Sanda 2 years ago
This decision table is a work of art! I bet the person who made it has a PhD in Fuel Expense Management. Very thorough and precise.
RO
Rolf 2 years ago
I'm not sure about Test Case 1. Shouldn't the company at least allow some kind of claim, even if it's not the full amount? Seems a bit harsh to completely disallow it.
VE
Venita 2 years ago
↳ replying to Rolf
Yeah, it would be more fair to allow some kind of claim, even if it's not the full amount.
JE
Jestine 2 years ago
↳ replying to Rolf
I agree, it does seem a bit harsh. Maybe the company should reconsider their policy.
AI
Aileen 2 years ago
↳ replying to Rolf
Test Case 2 is valid because the employee drives a 1700cc diesel car, which falls under band C for expense claims.
TA
Tammy 2 years ago
↳ replying to Rolf
I agree, it does seem a bit harsh. But that's how the decision table is structured.
LE
Leonard 2 years ago
↳ replying to Rolf
Test Case 1 seems too strict. Maybe they should allow a partial claim instead of none at all.
DE
Delfina 2 years ago
↳ replying to Rolf
Test Case 1 is invalid because the company does not allow any fuel expense claim for employees who are not car or motorcycle drivers.
SH
Sharan 2 years ago
Test Case 2 is definitely valid. Why would the company not accept fuel expenses for a diesel car? That's just common sense.
OC
Ocie 2 years ago
↳ replying to Sharan
Yeah, Test Case 2 is definitely valid. The company should accept fuel expenses for a diesel car.
KR
Kristal 2 years ago
↳ replying to Sharan
I agree, Test Case 2 is valid. It makes sense to accept fuel expenses for a diesel car.
CH
Charlesetta 2 years ago
↳ replying to Sharan
Yeah, Test Case 2 is definitely valid. The company should accept expenses for a diesel car.
FR
Freida 2 years ago
↳ replying to Sharan
I agree, Test Case 2 is valid. It makes sense to accept fuel expenses for a diesel car.
PA
Patti 2 years ago
↳ replying to Sharan
I agree, Test Case 2 is valid because it falls under band C in the decision table.
DU
Dusti 2 years ago
↳ replying to Sharan
Test Case 2 is definitely valid. Why would the company not accept fuel expenses for a diesel car? That's just common sense.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel