Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ISTQB CT-TAE Exam - Topic 4 Question 55 Discussion

Posted by Dottie on Jul 11, 2025 at 12:43 AM

A regression test suite consist of 500 test cases which are all executed manually. The business case for a pilot project is based on the adoption of test automation using a commercial tool that will reduce the execution time by a factor of 90% for 100% of the tests in the regression test suite. The pilot project lasted one month ( as planned) and you are currently its results. At the end of the pilot project, 40% of the regression tests have been automated and their execution time has been reduce by 60%.

Which of the following statements is TRUE in this scenario?

Suggested Answer: D

Get Premium CT-TAE Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
30 comments · newest first
AL
Albina 10 months ago
Wait, how can they expect 90% reduction with just 40% automated?
NE
Nenita 10 months ago
60% time reduction is still impressive though!
RO
Rolande 10 months ago
The pilot project only automated 40% of tests.
MO
Mona 10 months ago
Maybe the project was rushed, but results are still valuable.
MA
Mary 10 months ago
I think the target was way too ambitious!
TI
Timothy 11 months ago
From what I studied, it seems like the target defined for the business case was indeed difficult to achieve, so option D might be the right choice.
JA
James 11 months ago
I’m a bit confused about whether the project being too critical is a valid point. I thought we learned that it should be balanced, but I can’t recall the specifics.
LE
Leatha 11 months ago
I think we practiced a question about setting realistic targets, and it seems like the 90% reduction was overly ambitious given the results.
BR
Broderick 11 months ago
I remember discussing how pilot projects should have clear success criteria, but I’m not sure if the duration was really the issue here.
SH
Shaun 11 months ago
I think the best approach is to consider the overall feasibility of the target based on the pilot project results. The question is asking which statement is true, so I'll need to weigh the options carefully.
CH
Cherelle 12 months ago
The key here is to focus on the actual results of the pilot project. If only 40% of the tests were automated and the execution time was reduced by 60%, then the target may not be achievable.
AU
Audry 12 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the wording around the "success factors." I'll need to re-read that part carefully to make sure I'm interpreting it correctly.
SH
Sheridan 12 months ago
The target reduction of 90% execution time seems quite ambitious. I'll need to carefully analyze the results of the pilot project to determine if that's a realistic goal.
MA
Marsha 1 year ago
This question seems straightforward, but I want to make sure I understand the details before answering.
MA
Marget 1 year ago
Haha, the business case sounds like it was written by a salesman trying to impress the client. 90% reduction in execution time? That's like promising a Ferrari for the price of a bicycle!
PO
Portia 1 year ago
↳ replying to Marget
I know, right? It does sound too good to be true.
TH
Theola 1 year ago
↳ replying to Marget
B: I agree, it's important to set realistic targets in business cases.
AL
Alonzo 1 year ago
↳ replying to Marget
A: Yeah, that does sound too good to be true.
ON
Onita 1 year ago
Selecting a critical project for the pilot is a bold move, but I think it's a good strategy to show the real impact of test automation. As long as the team is capable, it could pay off big time.
AL
Aleshia 1 year ago
It should be realistic and achievable.
ME
Melinda 1 year ago
I agree, the target defined in the business case is too accurate and specific. It should have been more realistic and flexible, like 'significantly reduce execution time' instead of a specific 90% target.
MO
Mona 1 year ago
↳ replying to Melinda
D: Agreed, being too specific can lead to unrealistic expectations.
KA
Kattie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Melinda
C: Maybe they should have focused on just reducing time significantly.
CO
Corrie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Melinda
B: Yeah, it's hard to hit such a specific goal.
LE
Lea 1 year ago
↳ replying to Melinda
A: The target should have been more realistic and flexible.
JO
Joye 1 year ago
The pilot project duration of one month seems a bit short to fully automate 100% of the regression tests. The 60% reduction in execution time for the 40% automated tests is a good start, but the target of 90% reduction seems too ambitious.
CA
Catalina 1 year ago
↳ replying to Joye
A: The duration of the pilot project was too short --it should last until the success factors are achieved.
RE
Rebbecca 1 year ago
The target defined for the business case seems difficult to hit.
WI
William 1 year ago
I agree, it should last until the success factors are achieved.
DO
Dorsey 1 year ago
I think the duration of the pilot project was too short.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel