I think option A sounds like a clear advantage of automation. It’s hard to imagine how you could do some tests manually, but I’m not sure about the others.
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like option C might be the one that doesn't fit. I recall a practice question where we talked about defect detection rates.
I think the question is asking for something that isn't really a benefit of test automation. I remember discussing how automation can help with repetitive tasks.
Ah, I think I've got it. The ability to enable a better use of skilled testers by freeing them from repetitive and boring tasks - that's probably the one that's not an advantage. Test automation should make things easier for the testers, not replace them entirely.
Okay, let's see. The ability to perform difficult tests, run more tests faster, find more defects, and free up testers - those all sound like good things. I wonder which one could be considered a disadvantage?
Hildegarde
2 months agoDottie
2 months agoTamesha
3 months agoGalen
3 months agoLonna
3 months agoRenea
3 months agoDesmond
4 months agoLai
4 months agoBelen
4 months agoNettie
4 months agoDenny
4 months agoLuisa
5 months agoSue
5 months agoEsteban
8 months agoLorrine
7 months agoAriel
7 months agoRory
7 months agoArthur
8 months agoNatalie
8 months agoZona
8 months agoLorrie
7 months agoRobt
7 months agoCristal
7 months agoArthur
8 months agoJackie
8 months agoVal
8 months agoIesha
8 months agoValentin
8 months agoAlita
8 months agoPaola
9 months agoJacqueline
8 months agoAdell
8 months agoRoy
8 months ago