Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ISTQB Exam CT-TAE Topic 1 Question 23 Discussion

Actual exam question for ISTQB's CT-TAE exam
Question #: 23
Topic #: 1
[All CT-TAE Questions]

As the TAE, you are working with the organisation's Test Manager to decide which external metrics and which internal metrics should be gathered for the new TAS.

Which of the following represents the BEST internal metric that would help measure the quality of the TAS and the number of problems associated with the TAS?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Billye at Mar 10, 2024, 07:46 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CT-TAE Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Gail
1 months ago
I'm pretty sure option D is the 'best' choice because it involves the word 'measure,' and everyone knows that the more you measure, the better your software will be. Right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Fannie
1 months ago
Option A seems like a good choice if you want to know how much it costs to keep your automated tests on life support. But who needs maintenance when you can just rewrite everything every release?
upvoted 0 times
...
Samira
2 months ago
Option B is interesting, but it doesn't directly measure the quality of the TAS itself. Saving manual test effort is a great benefit, but it doesn't tell us much about the TAS's internal health.
upvoted 0 times
Gladys
11 days ago
A: Definitely, it's important to have a measure of the quality of the automation code itself.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tawny
16 days ago
B: I agree, defect density within the TAS automation code would give us a good indication of any problems.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashlyn
1 months ago
A: I think option C would be the best internal metric to measure the quality of the TAS.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lashunda
2 months ago
I think option D is also a valid choice. Tracking the pass/fail rate of the automated tests can provide valuable insights into the reliability and stability of the TAS.
upvoted 0 times
My
11 days ago
The average maintenance cost to keep an automated test in sync with the SUT could give us a good indication of the efficiency of the TAS.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clement
15 days ago
I think measuring defect density within the TAS automation code is also important to ensure the quality of the tests.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ranee
1 months ago
I agree, tracking the pass/fail rate of the automated tests is crucial for assessing the reliability of the TAS.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Laticia
2 months ago
I agree with Sharee. Defect density in the automation code is a great internal metric to track, as it can help identify and address issues early on.
upvoted 0 times
Eleonora
11 days ago
D) A measure of how many automated tests pass and fail
upvoted 0 times
...
Karina
21 days ago
C) A measure of defect density within the TAS automation code
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
2 months ago
B) The number of hours of manual test effort saved by implementing a TAS
upvoted 0 times
...
Mary
2 months ago
A) The average maintenance cost to keep an automated test in sync with the SUT
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Erasmo
2 months ago
I see both points, but I think A) The average maintenance cost to keep an automated test in sync with the SUT could also be a valuable internal metric to consider.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernest
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe D) A measure of how many automated tests pass and fail would be a better metric to measure the quality of the TAS.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharee
2 months ago
Option C is the best choice here. Measuring the defect density in the automation code is crucial to ensuring the quality of the TAS.
upvoted 0 times
Josue
1 months ago
That's true, but I still think option C is more directly related to the quality of the TAS.
upvoted 0 times
...
Olene
2 months ago
But wouldn't measuring how many automated tests pass and fail also be important?
upvoted 0 times
...
Raymon
2 months ago
I agree, that would give us a good indication of the quality of the TAS.
upvoted 0 times
...
Trinidad
2 months ago
I think option C is the best choice. It's important to measure defect density in the automation code.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Hailey
2 months ago
I think the best internal metric would be C) A measure of defect density within the TAS automation code.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel