MENU
The GUI of a Customer Relationship Management (CRM) application has been delivered through internet Explorer with proprietary Active X and Java controls. This implementation enables rich client capabilities, but specific commercial automation tools are necessary to automate test cases at GUI of functional test cases. This is to demonstrate whether a small set of the commercial are able to properly recognize actions taken by a tester when interacting with GUI of the CRM application.
Which of the following scripting techniques would be MOST suitable in this scenario?
Suggested Answer: C
Get Premium CT-TAE Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
40 comments · newest first
MY
Myra
11 months ago
Not sure if any of these will handle the rich client features well.
FR
Frederica
11 months ago
Wait, are we really using Active X for this? Seems risky.
SU
Sunshine
12 months ago
Linear scripting? That's so outdated for GUI testing!
JA
Jamal
12 months ago
I think keyword-driven scripting would work better here.
VI
Vincenza
12 months ago
Data-driven scripting is usually the best for CRM testing.
EM
Emilio
1 year ago
I vaguely recall that structured scripting could help organize the test cases better, but I'm not confident if it's the best fit for this specific CRM application.
EM
Emerson
1 year ago
I feel like linear scripting could be too rigid for this scenario since it doesn't adapt well to changes in the GUI.
TA
Taryn
1 year ago
I’m not entirely sure, but I think data-driven scripting might be more about managing input data rather than focusing on GUI interactions.
SA
Sang
1 year ago
I remember we discussed how keyword-driven scripting is great for GUI testing because it allows testers to use keywords that represent actions, which might be useful here.
CA
Carline
1 year ago
This seems like a straightforward question about best practices for drug screening. I think the key is ensuring confidentiality and protecting applicants' privacy.
KA
Kati
1 year ago
This question seems pretty straightforward. I'm confident I can identify the one option that doesn't constitute a conflict of interest.
LE
Leigha
1 year ago
Keyword-driven scripting, huh? Sounds like the CRM app is speaking in tongues. Better break out the Rosetta Stone and learn its language!
PH
Phuong
1 year ago
D) Structure scripting
GL
Gladys
1 year ago
C) Linear scripting
ME
Mel
1 year ago
B) Keyword-driven scripting
ST
Stacey
1 year ago
A) Data-driven scripting
TA
Tammi
1 year ago
Linear scripting? Please, this isn't the Stone Age! Keyword-driven all the way, baby. It's the only way to tame those ActiveX and Java controls.
ST
Stefany
1 year ago
I'm going with B - keyword-driven scripting. It's like a secret handshake with those commercial tools, and that's exactly what we need for this CRM app.
OR
Oretha
1 year ago
User 3: I think keyword-driven scripting will make it easier to automate test cases for the GUI.
HY
Hyun
1 year ago
User 2: Definitely, it's the best way to interact with those commercial automation tools.
JE
Jessenia
1 year ago
User 1: I agree, keyword-driven scripting is the way to go for this CRM app.
LA
Lakeesha
1 year ago
Data-driven scripting could work too, but I think keyword-driven is a better fit. It'll let us handle those proprietary controls more flexibly.
CL
Clare
1 year ago
Keyword-driven scripting is the way to go for sure, especially when dealing with proprietary controls in the CRM application.
IS
Isreal
1 year ago
I think keyword-driven scripting is the way to go, it will help us handle those proprietary controls more effectively.
YO
Yoko
1 year ago
Data-driven scripting could work too, but keyword-driven scripting seems like the best option for this scenario.
SH
Shawnda
1 year ago
Data-driven scripting could work too, but keyword-driven scripting seems like the best choice for this scenario.
GE
German
1 year ago
I agree, keyword-driven scripting would definitely be more flexible in handling those proprietary controls.
AL
Alishia
1 year ago
I agree, keyword-driven scripting would definitely give us more flexibility with those proprietary controls.
VA
Valentin
1 year ago
Hmm, this sounds like a tricky one. I'd say keyword-driven scripting would be the way to go here, since we need to automate those commercial tools and their specific actions.
IR
Irving
1 year ago
Structure scripting might be too rigid for the dynamic nature of the CRM application's GUI, keyword-driven is a better fit.
VE
Veronika
1 year ago
Linear scripting wouldn't be as effective in this case, we need something more targeted like keyword-driven scripting.
JO
Josefa
1 year ago
Data-driven scripting might work too, but keyword-driven seems more suitable for automating specific actions.
TR
Tresa
1 year ago
I agree, keyword-driven scripting would be the best choice for this scenario.
MA
Mauricio
1 year ago
Structure scripting might be too rigid for the dynamic nature of the CRM application, keyword-driven scripting offers more flexibility.
DI
Dion
1 year ago
Linear scripting wouldn't be as effective in this case, we need something more targeted like keyword-driven scripting.
VI
Viola
1 year ago
Data-driven scripting might work too, but keyword-driven seems more suitable for automating specific actions.
JI
Jill
1 year ago
I agree, keyword-driven scripting would be the best choice for this scenario.
MA
Ma
2 years ago
I personally prefer data-driven scripting as it allows for more flexibility in testing different scenarios.
ME
Meaghan
2 years ago
I agree with Ammie, keyword-driven scripting allows for easy maintenance and reusability of test scripts.
AM
Ammie
2 years ago
I think keyword-driven scripting would be most suitable.