Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ISTQB Exam ATTA Topic 3 Question 92 Discussion

Actual exam question for ISTQB's ATTA exam
Question #: 92
Topic #: 3
[All ATTA Questions]

It has been suggested to organize a performance test to find out more regarding the third risk. Which of the following would you use to quantify the situation and as a basis for defining a performance exit criteria? 2 credits [K3]

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Edward at Jul 14, 2024, 01:24 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ATTA Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Dorsey
2 months ago
Haha, good one! I bet the test creators are just trying to trip us up. But I'm sticking with D - time to perform the function is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Chun
2 months ago
I think D is the best choice for quantifying the situation in a performance test.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alison
2 months ago
Definitely, time to perform the function is a key factor in performance testing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kerrie
2 months ago
I agree, D seems like the most relevant option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Selma
3 months ago
Ha! I'm not falling for that trick question. Clearly, the answer is D. Time to perform the function is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Glynda
1 months ago
User 3: I think we can confidently choose D) Time to perform the function for the performance test.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kent
2 months ago
User 2: Definitely, it's a reliable measure to use as a basis for defining performance exit criteria.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharen
2 months ago
User 1: I agree, D) Time to perform the function is the best option for quantifying the situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Refugia
3 months ago
Oooh, tough one! I'm torn between C and D. Number of errors made by the user or time to perform the function... decisions, decisions!
upvoted 0 times
Sharika
2 months ago
User2: I see your point, but I believe C is more important. Number of errors made by the user can really impact the overall performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Essie
3 months ago
User1: I think D is the way to go. Time to perform the function is crucial for performance testing.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
In
3 months ago
I believe Change parameter success ratio could also be a useful metric to quantify the situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barney
3 months ago
I'm going with option B. The change parameter success ratio could give us a good idea of how the system is performing under stress.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latosha
3 months ago
Hmm, I think option D would be the best choice here. Time to perform the function seems like a solid metric to quantify the situation and define a performance exit criteria.
upvoted 0 times
Maryann
2 months ago
Let's go with option D then, it seems to be the most practical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annita
2 months ago
I see your point, but I still think time to perform the function is more relevant.
upvoted 0 times
...
Olive
2 months ago
But what about option A? Defect analysis time could also be useful.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roslyn
2 months ago
I agree, option D would give us a clear idea of performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nelida
4 months ago
I agree with Salena, Time to perform the function would be a good basis for defining performance exit criteria.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salena
4 months ago
I think we should use Time to perform the function to quantify the situation.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel