MENU
It has been suggested to organize a performance test to find out more regarding the third risk. Which of the following would you use to quantify the situation and as a basis for defining a performance exit criteria? 2 credits [K3]
Suggested Answer: C
Get Premium ATTA Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
36 comments · newest first
LI
Lisha
10 months ago
Totally agree with Tom, time to perform is key!
OW
Owen
11 months ago
Wait, how can we trust the user error count (C) to be accurate?
CL
Clorinda
11 months ago
Defect analysis time (A) is crucial for understanding risks.
TA
Tanja
11 months ago
I disagree, option B gives a clearer picture of success.
TO
Tom
11 months ago
I think option D is the best choice for performance criteria.
ME
Melinda
12 months ago
I feel like time to perform the function is a straightforward choice, but I’m not confident if it’s the best option for this scenario.
MA
Mabelle
12 months ago
The number of errors made by the user seems like a good metric, but I wonder if it really captures the whole performance picture.
TR
Trina
12 months ago
I think the change parameter success ratio could be relevant, but I can't recall if it was specifically mentioned in our practice questions.
EL
Elke
1 year ago
I remember we discussed using defect analysis time in class, but I'm not entirely sure how it relates to performance exit criteria.
AL
Albina
1 year ago
I'm a little confused by this question. I'm not sure which of these options would be the best to quantify the situation and define the performance exit criteria. I might need to re-read the question a few times.
GL
Glenn
1 year ago
Time to perform the function, option D, seems like the most logical choice here. That's what I'm going with.
ST
Stephaine
1 year ago
Okay, let me think this through. I'm leaning towards B - change parameter success ratio, as that seems like it would directly quantify the third risk.
MA
Marguerita
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'm debating between B and D, but I'm not totally confident in either choice.
SH
Sherell
1 year ago
This question seems straightforward, I think I'll go with option D - time to perform the function.
CE
Ceola
1 year ago
Okay, let's see. A desktop printer is definitely not wireless, and an email server is just a computer on a network, not a device you can carry around. I think the Blackberry or PDA is the best answer here.
IV
Ivan
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused about the specifics here. Do we need to implement a custom function, or is there a built-in way to load the fairness metrics? I'll need to carefully read through the question again and think through the options.
DO
Dorsey
1 year ago
Haha, good one! I bet the test creators are just trying to trip us up. But I'm sticking with D - time to perform the function is the way to go.
CH
Chun
1 year ago
I think D is the best choice for quantifying the situation in a performance test.
AL
Alison
1 year ago
Definitely, time to perform the function is a key factor in performance testing.
KE
Kerrie
1 year ago
I agree, D seems like the most relevant option.
SE
Selma
1 year ago
Ha! I'm not falling for that trick question. Clearly, the answer is D. Time to perform the function is the way to go.
GL
Glynda
1 year ago
User 3: I think we can confidently choose D) Time to perform the function for the performance test.
KE
Kent
1 year ago
User 2: Definitely, it's a reliable measure to use as a basis for defining performance exit criteria.
SH
Sharen
1 year ago
User 1: I agree, D) Time to perform the function is the best option for quantifying the situation.
RE
Refugia
1 year ago
Oooh, tough one! I'm torn between C and D. Number of errors made by the user or time to perform the function... decisions, decisions!
SH
Sharika
1 year ago
User2: I see your point, but I believe C is more important. Number of errors made by the user can really impact the overall performance.
ES
Essie
1 year ago
User1: I think D is the way to go. Time to perform the function is crucial for performance testing.
IN
In
1 year ago
I believe Change parameter success ratio could also be a useful metric to quantify the situation.
BA
Barney
1 year ago
I'm going with option B. The change parameter success ratio could give us a good idea of how the system is performing under stress.
LA
Latosha
2 years ago
Hmm, I think option D would be the best choice here. Time to perform the function seems like a solid metric to quantify the situation and define a performance exit criteria.
MA
Maryann
1 year ago
Let's go with option D then, it seems to be the most practical choice.
AN
Annita
1 year ago
I see your point, but I still think time to perform the function is more relevant.
OL
Olive
1 year ago
But what about option A? Defect analysis time could also be useful.
RO
Roslyn
1 year ago
I agree, option D would give us a clear idea of performance.
NE
Nelida
2 years ago
I agree with Salena, Time to perform the function would be a good basis for defining performance exit criteria.
SA
Salena
2 years ago
I think we should use Time to perform the function to quantify the situation.