ISTQB ATTA Exam - Topic 3 Question 92 Discussion

Actual exam question for ISTQB's ATTA exam

Question #: 92
Topic #: 3

[All ATTA Questions]

It has been suggested to organize a performance test to find out more regarding the third risk. Which of the following would you use to quantify the situation and as a basis for defining a performance exit criteria? 2 credits [K3]

ADefect analysis time

BChange parameter success ratio

CNumber of errors made by the user

DTime to perform the function

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Edward at Jul 14, 2024, 01:24 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ATTA Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Lisha

3 months ago

Totally agree with Tom, time to perform is key!

upvoted 0 times

...

Owen

3 months ago

Wait, how can we trust the user error count (C) to be accurate?

upvoted 0 times

...

Clorinda

3 months ago

Defect analysis time (A) is crucial for understanding risks.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tanja

4 months ago

I disagree, option B gives a clearer picture of success.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tom

4 months ago

I think option D is the best choice for performance criteria.

upvoted 0 times

...

Melinda

4 months ago

I feel like time to perform the function is a straightforward choice, but I’m not confident if it’s the best option for this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mabelle

4 months ago

The number of errors made by the user seems like a good metric, but I wonder if it really captures the whole performance picture.

upvoted 0 times

...

Trina

4 months ago

I think the change parameter success ratio could be relevant, but I can't recall if it was specifically mentioned in our practice questions.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elke

5 months ago

I remember we discussed using defect analysis time in class, but I'm not entirely sure how it relates to performance exit criteria.

upvoted 0 times

...

Albina

5 months ago

I'm a little confused by this question. I'm not sure which of these options would be the best to quantify the situation and define the performance exit criteria. I might need to re-read the question a few times.

upvoted 0 times

...

Glenn

5 months ago

Time to perform the function, option D, seems like the most logical choice here. That's what I'm going with.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stephaine

5 months ago

Okay, let me think this through. I'm leaning towards B - change parameter success ratio, as that seems like it would directly quantify the third risk.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marguerita

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'm debating between B and D, but I'm not totally confident in either choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sherell

5 months ago

This question seems straightforward, I think I'll go with option D - time to perform the function.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ceola

5 months ago

Okay, let's see. A desktop printer is definitely not wireless, and an email server is just a computer on a network, not a device you can carry around. I think the Blackberry or PDA is the best answer here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ivan

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit confused about the specifics here. Do we need to implement a custom function, or is there a built-in way to load the fairness metrics? I'll need to carefully read through the question again and think through the options.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dorsey

10 months ago

Haha, good one! I bet the test creators are just trying to trip us up. But I'm sticking with D - time to perform the function is the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

Chun

9 months ago

I think D is the best choice for quantifying the situation in a performance test.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alison

9 months ago

Definitely, time to perform the function is a key factor in performance testing.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kerrie

9 months ago

I agree, D seems like the most relevant option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Selma

10 months ago

Ha! I'm not falling for that trick question. Clearly, the answer is D. Time to perform the function is the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

Glynda

9 months ago

User 3: I think we can confidently choose D) Time to perform the function for the performance test.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kent

9 months ago

User 2: Definitely, it's a reliable measure to use as a basis for defining performance exit criteria.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sharen

9 months ago

User 1: I agree, D) Time to perform the function is the best option for quantifying the situation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Refugia

10 months ago

Oooh, tough one! I'm torn between C and D. Number of errors made by the user or time to perform the function... decisions, decisions!

upvoted 0 times

Sharika

9 months ago

User2: I see your point, but I believe C is more important. Number of errors made by the user can really impact the overall performance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Essie

10 months ago

User1: I think D is the way to go. Time to perform the function is crucial for performance testing.

upvoted 0 times

...

In

10 months ago

I believe Change parameter success ratio could also be a useful metric to quantify the situation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Barney

10 months ago

I'm going with option B. The change parameter success ratio could give us a good idea of how the system is performing under stress.

upvoted 0 times

...

Latosha

11 months ago

Hmm, I think option D would be the best choice here. Time to perform the function seems like a solid metric to quantify the situation and define a performance exit criteria.

upvoted 0 times