Coverage measurements are often difficult, and the need to train testers and gain skills are the two most important things the organization should be aware of in my opinion.
The cost of maintenance of test scripts and the fact that test management will become more time-consuming seem like the biggest potential issues to me. I'll select those.
Okay, let's see. I think the lack of good process as a baseline and the need to train testers and gain skills are the two most significant pitfalls here. I'll go with those.
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. There are a few options that seem plausible, but I'll need to carefully consider the implications of each before deciding.
This seems like a straightforward risk management question. I'll think through the options carefully and choose the one that best matches the scenario.
I'm not sure about the 'need to train testers' one. Isn't that a given for any new technology? What's next, 'organizations should be aware that they need to buy computers'?
The cost of maintaining test scripts is definitely a big one. I've seen projects struggle with that in the past. And coverage measurements can be tricky too.
Hmm, I think the lack of a good process as a baseline and the need to train testers are the two most significant pitfalls. Having a solid foundation is crucial for successful test automation.
Ivette
6 months agoDenny
6 months agoSherell
6 months agoCathrine
7 months agoIraida
7 months agoDeeann
7 months agoShantell
7 months agoLatrice
7 months agoDyan
8 months agoLouis
8 months agoKerry
8 months agoHelene
8 months agoEdelmira
8 months agoShakira
8 months agoHildegarde
8 months agoHenriette
8 months agoCarmen
1 year agoGoldie
12 months agoTruman
12 months agoLilli
12 months agoAnnice
1 year agoWilliam
1 year agoCarisa
1 year agoLoise
1 year agoRashad
1 year agoLyndia
1 year agoEladia
1 year agoOmer
1 year agoEthan
1 year agoRosenda
1 year agoPortia
1 year agoGerardo
1 year agoSimona
1 year agoDacia
1 year agoRupert
1 year agoElvis
1 year ago