Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ISTQB ATTA Exam - Topic 3 Question 74 Discussion

Identify TWO main advantages of this approach to incident management. (3 credits, for 1 out of 2 correct 1 credit) 3 credits [K4]
A) Quick to set up and cheap
B) Electronic rather than manual
C) Allows attachments (e.g. screen prints) to be linked to the incident reports
D) Can easily be integrated with open source tools
E) Large files are not a problem

ISTQB ATTA Exam - Topic 3 Question 74 Discussion

Actual exam question for ISTQB's ATTA exam
Question #: 74
Topic #: 3
[All ATTA Questions]

Identify TWO main advantages of this approach to incident management. (3 credits, for 1 out of 2 correct 1 credit) 3 credits [K4]

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Minna at Oct 07, 2023, 11:53 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ATTA Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Glory
10 months ago
Integration with open source tools is a game changer!
upvoted 0 times
...
Nohemi
10 months ago
Wait, can it really handle large files? Sounds too good to be true.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashton
11 months ago
I think allowing attachments is super helpful too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherita
11 months ago
Totally agree, electronic is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Keneth
11 months ago
Quick to set up and cheap is a big plus!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusa
11 months ago
Integration with open source tools sounds familiar, but I’m not confident if that’s one of the top two advantages we discussed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantay
11 months ago
I feel like allowing attachments to incident reports is really useful, but I can't recall if it was mentioned as a main advantage in our study materials.
upvoted 0 times
...
Twana
12 months ago
I remember practicing a question about incident management tools, and I think being electronic rather than manual is a significant advantage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stevie
12 months ago
I think one advantage could be that it's quick to set up and cheap, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mica
12 months ago
I feel confident about this one. The "Quick to set up and cheap" and "Allows attachments (e.g. screen prints) to be linked to the incident reports" options are the clear winners in my opinion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Patrick
12 months ago
The "Electronic rather than manual" option seems like a pretty big advantage, but I'm not sure if that's the best one. I'll need to weigh the pros and cons of each choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pamella
12 months ago
Okay, let's see. I think "Quick to set up and cheap" and "Allows attachments (e.g. screen prints) to be linked to the incident reports" are the two main advantages here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephane
12 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'll need to carefully read through the options and think about which ones are the most significant advantages.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gussie
12 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question, I should be able to identify the two main advantages pretty easily.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francesco
1 year ago
Okay, let's think this through. Solidity is definitely a must-choose, since it's the most widely used language for Ethereum smart contracts. As for the second one, I'm torn between Truffle and Serpent. I'll have to weigh the pros and cons of each.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
1 year ago
This looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully read through the code and think it through step-by-step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosamond
1 year ago
Okay, the key here is that the attacker was able to access the system as root using a simple SQL injection attack. That means the application failed to properly validate the input, so I'm going with A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thurman
1 year ago
As a veteran of the incident management wars, I can tell you that C and D are the way to go. Attachments and open source FTW! Although, 'quick to set up and cheap' - someone's been drinking the Kool-Aid, if you ask me.
upvoted 0 times
Zana
1 year ago
Yeah, 'quick to set up and cheap' doesn't always mean it's the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nadine
1 year ago
Quick setup and cheap may sound good, but attachments and open source integration are key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lanie
1 year ago
I agree, they make incident management much more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celia
1 year ago
Attachments and open source tools are definitely the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johanna
1 year ago
I agree, they make incident management much more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryln
1 year ago
Attachments and open source tools are definitely the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Elvera
1 year ago
Eve
upvoted 0 times
Ceola
1 year ago
C) Allows attachments (e.g. screen prints) to be linked to the incident reports
upvoted 0 times
...
Ceola
1 year ago
A) Quick to set up and cheap
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Trina
1 year ago
But what about option C? Attachments could be really helpful too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilma
1 year ago
I agree, quick setup is definitely a plus.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ressie
1 year ago
I think option A is a good advantage.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel