MENU
Part 7 "Test Process & Incident Management"
The development manager asks you to identify suitable test coverage entry criteria for a component test. Which TWO of the following would you recommend as appropriate for entry criteria to a component testing phase? 2 credits [K3]
Suggested Answer: D, E
Get Premium ATTA Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
13 comments · newest first
WA
Wayne
11 months ago
Wait, people actually think 100% coverage is realistic? That's bold!
MA
Marilynn
11 months ago
C is nice to have, but not critical for entry.
BA
Barbra
12 months ago
Not sure about E. Static analysis can miss a lot of issues.
RE
Ressie
12 months ago
I think A is also important. 100% statement coverage is a must!
BO
Bobbye
12 months ago
I’d go with B and D for sure. No defects and code review are key!
JA
Jacquelyne
1 year ago
I recall something about static analysis being useful too. Maybe option E is relevant, but I can't remember if it was a must-have for entry criteria.
AL
Alisha
1 year ago
I feel like "Code review completed" (option D) is also important. If the code hasn't been reviewed, how can we trust it for testing?
FR
Francis
1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure about the 100% statement coverage. It seems like a high bar for component testing, but I remember it being mentioned in practice questions.
GA
Gail
1 year ago
I think option B, "No critical outstanding defects," is definitely a good entry criterion. It makes sense to start testing when there are no major issues.
DE
Dell
1 year ago
I'm pretty sure the answer is D. All of the above. The question specifically mentions GVP 8.1.2, which I know allows you to set and change logging levels through various interfaces.
LE
Levi
1 year ago
I feel pretty good about this question. I remember learning about the different actions that can cause triggers to fire, so I think I can narrow it down and select the right answer.
DO
Dominque
1 year ago
This one seems a bit tricky. I'll need to think it through carefully.
LU
Luisa
1 year ago
I'm pretty confident that the correct answer is to create the necessary system status values. The question specifically states that Contoso wants to ensure they can track all the stages in their service management workflow, and creating the system status values seems like the best way to do that.