ISTQB ATTA Exam - Topic 3 Question 64 Discussion

Actual exam question for ISTQB's ATTA exam

Question #: 64
Topic #: 3

Part 7 "Test Process & Incident Management"

The development manager asks you to identify suitable test coverage entry criteria for a component test. Which TWO of the following would you recommend as appropriate for entry criteria to a component testing phase? 2 credits [K3]

A100% statement coverage

BNo critical outstanding defects

CTest log available

DCode review completed

EStatic analysis shows no major violations

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D, E

by Oretha at Feb 06, 2023, 05:07 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ATTA Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Wayne

7 months ago

Wait, people actually think 100% coverage is realistic? That's bold!

upvoted 0 times

...

Marilynn

7 months ago

C is nice to have, but not critical for entry.

upvoted 0 times

...

Barbra

7 months ago

Not sure about E. Static analysis can miss a lot of issues.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ressie

7 months ago

I think A is also important. 100% statement coverage is a must!

upvoted 0 times

...

Bobbye

7 months ago

I’d go with B and D for sure. No defects and code review are key!

upvoted 0 times

...

Jacquelyne

8 months ago

I recall something about static analysis being useful too. Maybe option E is relevant, but I can't remember if it was a must-have for entry criteria.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alisha

8 months ago

I feel like "Code review completed" (option D) is also important. If the code hasn't been reviewed, how can we trust it for testing?

upvoted 0 times

...

Francis

8 months ago

I'm not entirely sure about the 100% statement coverage. It seems like a high bar for component testing, but I remember it being mentioned in practice questions.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gail

8 months ago

I think option B, "No critical outstanding defects," is definitely a good entry criterion. It makes sense to start testing when there are no major issues.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dell

8 months ago

I'm pretty sure the answer is D. All of the above. The question specifically mentions GVP 8.1.2, which I know allows you to set and change logging levels through various interfaces.

upvoted 0 times

...

Levi

8 months ago

I feel pretty good about this question. I remember learning about the different actions that can cause triggers to fire, so I think I can narrow it down and select the right answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dominque

8 months ago

This one seems a bit tricky. I'll need to think it through carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...

Luisa

8 months ago

I'm pretty confident that the correct answer is to create the necessary system status values. The question specifically states that Contoso wants to ensure they can track all the stages in their service management workflow, and creating the system status values seems like the best way to do that.

upvoted 0 times

...