New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ISTQB ATTA Exam - Topic 3 Question 115 Discussion

Actual exam question for ISTQB's ATTA exam
Question #: 115
Topic #: 3
[All ATTA Questions]

Part 1 "Test Techniques various"

The result of a product risk analysis performed on components I, II and III of the airplane control system shows the following risk matrix:

The project wants to mitigate the risks by defining different types of coverage depending on the risk level of the components. Which of the following would be a meaningful solution for setting the coverage targets? 2 credits [K3]

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Vince at Aug 17, 2025, 10:49 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ATTA Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Horace
2 months ago
I like how option C prioritizes decision coverage for critical components!
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
2 months ago
Not sure if these coverage types really match the risks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Judy
2 months ago
Wait, why is no one considering option D?
upvoted 0 times
...
Diego
3 months ago
I disagree, B seems more balanced to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
King
3 months ago
I think option A makes the most sense for risk levels.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gayla
3 months ago
I feel like I might have seen a question where multiple condition coverage was prioritized for critical components. I wonder if that applies here too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fletcher
3 months ago
I thought condition determination coverage was important for complex logic, but I’m uncertain if it should be the first choice for component I.
upvoted 0 times
...
Magdalene
4 months ago
This question feels similar to one we practiced about coverage types. I think decision coverage might be more suitable for higher-risk components, but I can't recall the exact order.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karrie
4 months ago
I remember we discussed how different coverage types apply to varying risk levels, but I'm not sure which one fits best for each component here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sean
4 months ago
Ah, I see what they're getting at. The higher the risk, the more thorough the coverage needs to be. I'll need to think carefully about how to apply the different techniques to mitigate the risks effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lizette
4 months ago
This seems straightforward enough. I just need to analyze the risk matrix and select the combination of coverage techniques that best addresses the risks for each component. I'm confident I can figure this out.
upvoted 0 times
...
An
4 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the different coverage techniques mentioned. I'll need to refresh my memory on what each one entails before I can decide which would be the best solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yesenia
5 months ago
Okay, I think I understand the question. The key is to match the right coverage technique to the risk level of each component. I'll need to consider the differences between condition determination, decision, and statement coverage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shanda
5 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully review the risk matrix and think about which coverage techniques would be most appropriate for each component.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorsey
5 months ago
I think option D is the best solution. Multiple condition coverage for the high-risk component I, decision coverage for the medium-risk component II, and condition determination coverage for the low-risk component III seems like a reasonable approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuki
5 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tran
6 months ago
I think the answer is A.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel