Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ISTQB ATTA Exam - Topic 2 Question 7 Discussion

Posted by Natalie on May 06, 2022 at 09:07 PM

For equivalence partitioning based on this specification, how many input classes can be determined? 2 credits [K3]

Suggested Answer: A

Get Premium ATTA Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
13 comments · newest first
MA
Marisha 11 months ago
8 classes? That sounds way too high!
AN
Annice 12 months ago
Wait, are we sure it's not 4? That seems low.
ME
Merilyn 12 months ago
I agree, 6 seems right based on the specs.
LY
Lyndia 12 months ago
Definitely 6 classes, no doubt about it.
AL
Alise 1 year ago
I think there are 5 input classes.
AL
Alfreda 1 year ago
I have a feeling it might be 6, but I also remember some examples where it was less. This is tricky!
TE
Tequila 1 year ago
I recall that equivalence partitioning often leads to multiple classes, but I can't remember if it was 5 or 8 for this specific case.
NA
Natalie 1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like it could be 4 or 6. I need to double-check the criteria for partitioning.
BE
Benedict 1 year ago
I think we practiced a similar question in class, and I remember there being around 5 input classes.
ES
Essie 1 year ago
Okay, I've got this. Web crawling and phishing are the two methods that attackers commonly use to find new victims. I'm confident in those answers.
HI
Hillary 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The XSLT transformation can produce different results depending on the specific rules and templates defined in the stylesheet. I'll need to review the details closely.
DO
Dominga 1 year ago
I've got this! The key fields are Agent Name, WrapUp Time, and Service Level. I'm confident those are the right three.
BE
Belen 1 year ago
Ah, I think I've got this one. The managed identity for the VM should allow me to get an access token directly from the code running on the VM. I'll just need to make the right API call to the local endpoint. Shouldn't be too difficult.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel