Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ISTQB ATTA Exam - Topic 2 Question 59 Discussion

Posted by Quentin on Oct 24, 2022 at 04:51 AM

How many test cases are needed to test code fragment lines 26 -- 32 to achieve 100% condition determination coverage? 2 credits [K3]

Suggested Answer: D

Get Premium ATTA Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
36 comments · newest first
BE
Beckie 11 months ago
I thought it was 2, but now I'm not so sure...
EL
Elden 11 months ago
I agree, 3 should cover it just fine.
BE
Beatriz 12 months ago
Wait, are we sure it's not 5? Seems like a lot.
TH
Theron 12 months ago
Definitely 4 cases needed, can't skip any conditions!
SA
Samuel 12 months ago
I think it's 3 test cases for full coverage.
HA
Hailey 1 year ago
I recall that for condition determination coverage, it often requires more than just the basic cases, so maybe 5 is the right answer.
RU
Ruthann 1 year ago
I’m leaning towards 2 test cases, but I feel like there could be edge cases I’m missing.
LU
Ludivina 1 year ago
I remember practicing a similar question where we had to analyze branches, and I think it was 4 cases for full coverage.
AL
Alishia 1 year ago
I think we might need at least 3 test cases to cover all the conditions, but I'm not entirely sure.
BR
Bronwyn 1 year ago
Ah, this is a good one. I remember learning about AnalyticDB's compatibility features in class. I think I've got a good handle on this, so I'm feeling confident I can get the right answer.
KA
Kandis 1 year ago
Wait, is option C correct? I thought the fixed asset module was integrated with the general ledger, but maybe I'm misremembering that. I better review my study materials again to make sure I understand this properly.
GE
Genevieve 1 year ago
I remember someone mentioning that it's about making some processes slower to support the main flow. Is that reducing the rate mentioned in option B?
YU
Yuette 1 year ago
Honestly, I'm just hoping the exam doesn't have any tricky 'gotcha' questions like this one. I'll go with my gut and say 3 test cases.
ER
Eric 1 year ago
↳ replying to Yuette
I'll stick with 3 test cases as well.
RO
Roy 1 year ago
↳ replying to Yuette
I'm going with 4 test cases, just to be safe.
DE
Delpha 1 year ago
↳ replying to Yuette
I think 3 test cases should be enough.
VE
Veda 1 year ago
Haha, this exam question is a piece of cake! 2 test cases? What is this, amateur hour? C'mon, it's clearly 4 test cases.
MA
Margart 1 year ago
↳ replying to Veda
I'm pretty sure it's 4 test cases as well.
EM
Emile 1 year ago
↳ replying to Veda
No way, it's definitely 3 test cases.
NE
Nell 1 year ago
↳ replying to Veda
I think it's 4 test cases.
LE
Lenna 1 year ago
Wait, isn't the answer 5? You gotta cover all the possible conditions, man. D is the correct choice here.
AN
Antonette 1 year ago
Hold up, I think we need 4 test cases to achieve 100% condition determination coverage. Option C is the way to go.
TO
Tora 1 year ago
↳ replying to Antonette
Sounds good, let's select option C.
MA
Marnie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Antonette
Let's go with 4 test cases then.
IR
Iraida 1 year ago
↳ replying to Antonette
I agree, option C is the correct choice.
EL
Elly 1 year ago
↳ replying to Antonette
I think we need 4 test cases for full coverage.
FR
Franchesca 1 year ago
↳ replying to Antonette
Option C is the way to go.
GA
Gabriele 1 year ago
↳ replying to Antonette
I think we need 4 test cases to achieve 100% condition determination coverage.
MA
Margurite 2 years ago
But if we have 5 test cases, we can cover all possible conditions and ensure thorough testing.
TI
Tijuana 2 years ago
Hmm, this seems straightforward. I'd go with option B - 3 test cases should do the trick.
NA
Naomi 1 year ago
↳ replying to Tijuana
I agree with you, option B - 3 test cases seems like the right answer.
TH
Thora 1 year ago
↳ replying to Tijuana
I'm leaning towards option C - 4 test cases might be needed.
RO
Robt 1 year ago
↳ replying to Tijuana
I disagree, I believe option B - 3 test cases is the correct choice.
IZ
Izetta 1 year ago
↳ replying to Tijuana
I think option A - 2 test cases should be enough.
JA
Javier 2 years ago
I disagree, I believe we only need 3 test cases to achieve that coverage.
MA
Margurite 2 years ago
I think we need 4 test cases for 100% condition determination coverage.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel