Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ISTQB ATTA Exam - Topic 2 Question 59 Discussion

Actual exam question for ISTQB's ATTA exam
Question #: 59
Topic #: 2
[All ATTA Questions]

How many test cases are needed to test code fragment lines 26 -- 32 to achieve 100% condition determination coverage? 2 credits [K3]

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Beckie
7 months ago
I thought it was 2, but now I'm not so sure...
upvoted 0 times
...
Elden
7 months ago
I agree, 3 should cover it just fine.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beatriz
7 months ago
Wait, are we sure it's not 5? Seems like a lot.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theron
7 months ago
Definitely 4 cases needed, can't skip any conditions!
upvoted 0 times
...
Samuel
7 months ago
I think it's 3 test cases for full coverage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hailey
8 months ago
I recall that for condition determination coverage, it often requires more than just the basic cases, so maybe 5 is the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ruthann
8 months ago
I’m leaning towards 2 test cases, but I feel like there could be edge cases I’m missing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ludivina
8 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question where we had to analyze branches, and I think it was 4 cases for full coverage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alishia
8 months ago
I think we might need at least 3 test cases to cover all the conditions, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bronwyn
8 months ago
Ah, this is a good one. I remember learning about AnalyticDB's compatibility features in class. I think I've got a good handle on this, so I'm feeling confident I can get the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kandis
8 months ago
Wait, is option C correct? I thought the fixed asset module was integrated with the general ledger, but maybe I'm misremembering that. I better review my study materials again to make sure I understand this properly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Genevieve
8 months ago
I remember someone mentioning that it's about making some processes slower to support the main flow. Is that reducing the rate mentioned in option B?
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuette
1 year ago
Honestly, I'm just hoping the exam doesn't have any tricky 'gotcha' questions like this one. I'll go with my gut and say 3 test cases.
upvoted 0 times
Eric
12 months ago
I'll stick with 3 test cases as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roy
12 months ago
I'm going with 4 test cases, just to be safe.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delpha
12 months ago
I think 3 test cases should be enough.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Veda
1 year ago
Haha, this exam question is a piece of cake! 2 test cases? What is this, amateur hour? C'mon, it's clearly 4 test cases.
upvoted 0 times
Margart
1 year ago
I'm pretty sure it's 4 test cases as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emile
1 year ago
No way, it's definitely 3 test cases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nell
1 year ago
I think it's 4 test cases.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lenna
1 year ago
Wait, isn't the answer 5? You gotta cover all the possible conditions, man. D is the correct choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonette
1 year ago
Hold up, I think we need 4 test cases to achieve 100% condition determination coverage. Option C is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Tora
11 months ago
Sounds good, let's select option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marnie
11 months ago
Let's go with 4 test cases then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iraida
11 months ago
I agree, option C is the correct choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elly
11 months ago
I think we need 4 test cases for full coverage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Franchesca
11 months ago
Option C is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gabriele
1 year ago
I think we need 4 test cases to achieve 100% condition determination coverage.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Margurite
1 year ago
But if we have 5 test cases, we can cover all possible conditions and ensure thorough testing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tijuana
1 year ago
Hmm, this seems straightforward. I'd go with option B - 3 test cases should do the trick.
upvoted 0 times
Naomi
1 year ago
I agree with you, option B - 3 test cases seems like the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thora
1 year ago
I'm leaning towards option C - 4 test cases might be needed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Robt
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe option B - 3 test cases is the correct choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
1 year ago
I think option A - 2 test cases should be enough.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Javier
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe we only need 3 test cases to achieve that coverage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margurite
1 year ago
I think we need 4 test cases for 100% condition determination coverage.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel