I'm not totally confident, but I'm leaning towards B. The key is that 100% structural decision coverage means all the control flow branches were tested, not necessarily all possible data flows or execution paths.
Okay, I've got this. 100% structural decision coverage means that every possible branch or decision point in the code was executed at least once. So the answer is B.
Nah, 100% decision coverage doesn't guarantee that every path through the module was tested. That would require 100% path coverage, which is way more demanding. I'm going with B.
Hmm, I think the answer is B. If we achieved 100% structural decision coverage, that means every control flow branch was executed at least once. Seems straightforward enough.
Jonelle
5 months agoCeleste
5 months agoWilson
6 months agoRuthann
6 months agoRomana
6 months agoLisha
6 months agoAmber
7 months agoJacklyn
7 months agoRosio
7 months agoDarnell
7 months agoBen
7 months agoTwana
8 months agoDenae
8 months agoJunita
10 months agoDean
10 months agoCrista
10 months agoWeldon
9 months agoStarr
10 months agoJess
10 months agoLeeann
9 months agoKami
10 months agoGlen
10 months agoDeeanna
10 months agoLakeesha
10 months agoRusty
10 months agoLajuana
11 months agoValentine
10 months agoBuddy
10 months agoJesus
10 months agoLeonida
11 months ago