ISTQB ATTA Exam - Topic 12 Question 116 Discussion

Actual exam question for ISTQB's ATTA exam

Question #: 116
Topic #: 12

Part 3 "Bonus Program"

To support code reviews a checklist will be developed. Which TWO questions from the list would you implement as part of the code review checklist? 3 credits [K3]

AAre any magic numbers (numeric literals) used, other than 0 or 1?

BCan each item be implemented with the techniques, tools, and resources available?

CIs it possible during acceptance testing to verify whether the item has been satisfied?

DIs the item specified in an exact, unambiguous way?

EIs there any logic containing no statements and no explanation as to why it is empty?

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A, E

by Veronica at Nov 25, 2025, 01:31 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ATTA Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Brunilda

1 month ago

B and E are my picks. Resources matter for success.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lavera

2 months ago

A and C make sense. Testing should verify everything.

upvoted 0 times

...

Avery

2 months ago

I like D and E. Ambiguity leads to issues later.

upvoted 0 times

...

Edison

2 months ago

A is definitely needed. Clarity in D is also important.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stefania

2 months ago

I think A and D are crucial. Magic numbers can confuse.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rikki

2 months ago

D is a must-have, can't have ambiguity in code!

upvoted 0 times

...

Chaya

2 months ago

I agree with A, but E seems less relevant to me.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sanda

3 months ago

Wait, are magic numbers really that big of a deal?

upvoted 0 times

...

William

3 months ago

I think B is more important than people realize.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lewis

3 months ago

Haha, magic numbers? More like "sorcery numbers" am I right? A and D for the win!

upvoted 0 times

...

Yuriko

4 months ago

A and E. Who doesn't love a good magic number hunt? And empty logic? That's just begging for trouble.

upvoted 0 times

...

Laura

4 months ago

B and C are the ones I'd pick. Gotta make sure the code is actually doable and that we can test it properly.

upvoted 0 times

...

Raul

4 months ago

Definitely A and D. Gotta watch out for those sneaky magic numbers and make sure the requirements are crystal clear.

upvoted 0 times

...

Detra

4 months ago

I’m leaning towards A and E, but I’m not confident. Magic numbers are definitely a red flag, and empty logic should be addressed too.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dana

4 months ago

I practiced a similar question, and I feel like B and D might be the best fit. We need to ensure feasibility and clarity.

upvoted 0 times

...

Veta

4 months ago

I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about verifying items during testing. Maybe C and E could be good choices?

upvoted 0 times

...

Nickolas

5 months ago

I think options A and D are important because magic numbers can lead to confusion, and clarity in specifications is crucial.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cruz

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm not sure. I think I'd pick A and C, to make sure we're not using any sketchy magic numbers and that we can actually verify the requirements.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lenita

5 months ago

I'm feeling pretty confident about this. I'd go with B and D - those seem like the most essential things to check during a code review.

upvoted 0 times

...

Wava

5 months ago

I'm a bit confused by option E. What exactly are they looking for there? I'll have to think that one through more.

upvoted 0 times

...

Beckie

5 months ago

A and D are the way to go. No magic numbers and clear requirements - that's the key to a good code review.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tricia

5 months ago

Definitely A and D, those are crucial!

upvoted 0 times

...

Gerald

6 months ago

I prefer B and C. Feasibility is key for implementation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Iola

6 months ago

Okay, let's see here. I'm thinking B and D would be good choices - we want to make sure the requirements are clear and that the implementation is feasible.

upvoted 0 times

...