Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ISTQB ATTA Exam - Topic 1 Question 114 Discussion

The Bonus Program is perceived by management to be critical. Defects in the program would almost immediately lead to financial loss. In the past an improvement program has been run to implement review based on IEEE 1028. Knowledge and skills on both formal and informal reviews are available. There is also an existing pool of review leaders. Which of the following review types would you choose to review the program? 2 credits [K4]
B) Inspection
A) Informal review
C) Walkthrough
D) Management review

ISTQB ATTA Exam - Topic 1 Question 114 Discussion

Actual exam question for ISTQB's ATTA exam
Question #: 114
Topic #: 1
[All ATTA Questions]

The Bonus Program is perceived by management to be critical. Defects in the program would almost immediately lead to financial loss. In the past an improvement program has been run to implement review based on IEEE 1028. Knowledge and skills on both formal and informal reviews are available. There is also an existing pool of review leaders. Which of the following review types would you choose to review the program? 2 credits [K4]

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Willow at Aug 05, 2025, 04:45 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ATTA Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Vincent
6 months ago
Surprised there's a pool of review leaders available!
upvoted 0 times
...
Rhea
7 months ago
Management review could miss some details, though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keena
7 months ago
Really? I thought Walkthroughs were more effective for this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tricia
7 months ago
Totally agree, inspections are thorough!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tommy
8 months ago
I think an Inspection would be best for catching defects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dion
8 months ago
I practiced a similar question where informal reviews were suggested, but I feel like this situation needs something more structured.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuonne
8 months ago
Management reviews seem critical given the financial implications, but I wonder if they might lack the technical depth needed for this program.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimberely
8 months ago
I think a walkthrough could be useful since it allows for more interaction, but I’m not entirely confident about the best choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherry
8 months ago
I remember we discussed how inspections are really thorough, but I'm not sure if they’re necessary for this program.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iola
9 months ago
I'm leaning towards the walkthrough option. With the program being so important, a collaborative review with the team seems like it would be valuable to get multiple perspectives and identify issues early on.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alonso
9 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. Since the program is critical and there's existing review expertise, an inspection would be the best choice. That provides a formal, rigorous review process to catch any major defects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tien
9 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The question mentions different review types, but I'm not totally clear on the differences between them and which would be most appropriate here. I'll need to think it through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Levi
9 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about software review types. I'll need to carefully consider the key details provided, like the program being critical and the existing review expertise, to determine the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zona
10 months ago
I see your point, Tula. But I still think Inspection would be the best choice for detecting defects in the critical Bonus Program.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnta
10 months ago
Informal review? Are you kidding me? This is way too important for that. Inspection is the only way to ensure we don't lose all our bonus money!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tula
10 months ago
I would go with Management review, as it involves higher level management and can ensure alignment with company goals.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veronika
10 months ago
I agree with you, Nan. Inspection is more formal and thorough.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daron
10 months ago
Management review is the way to go. The Bonus Program is critical, so we need the big guns to sign off on it.
upvoted 0 times
Paulina
6 months ago
True, but management's perspective is crucial for this program.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sage
6 months ago
But what about inspections? They can catch defects early.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eden
7 months ago
I agree, management review is essential.
upvoted 0 times
...
Della
7 months ago
Definitely, we need their approval.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
India
11 months ago
I'd choose Walkthrough. It's a good balance between formality and efficiency, and the existing pool of review leaders can make it work well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chanel
11 months ago
Definitely go with Inspection. It's the most rigorous review type and will catch any critical defects in the Bonus Program.
upvoted 0 times
Ria
10 months ago
C) Walkthrough
upvoted 0 times
...
Junita
10 months ago
B) Inspection
upvoted 0 times
...
Josphine
10 months ago
A) Informal review
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nan
11 months ago
I think I would choose Inspection for reviewing the program.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel