Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ISTQB Exam ATTA Topic 1 Question 114 Discussion

Actual exam question for ISTQB's ATTA exam
Question #: 114
Topic #: 1
[All ATTA Questions]

The Bonus Program is perceived by management to be critical. Defects in the program would almost immediately lead to financial loss. In the past an improvement program has been run to implement review based on IEEE 1028. Knowledge and skills on both formal and informal reviews are available. There is also an existing pool of review leaders. Which of the following review types would you choose to review the program? 2 credits [K4]

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Willow at Aug 05, 2025, 05:45 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ATTA Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Levi
1 days ago
This seems like a straightforward question about software review types. I'll need to carefully consider the key details provided, like the program being critical and the existing review expertise, to determine the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnta
8 days ago
Informal review? Are you kidding me? This is way too important for that. Inspection is the only way to ensure we don't lose all our bonus money!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tula
9 days ago
I would go with Management review, as it involves higher level management and can ensure alignment with company goals.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daron
13 days ago
Management review is the way to go. The Bonus Program is critical, so we need the big guns to sign off on it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veronika
13 days ago
I agree with you, Nan. Inspection is more formal and thorough.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zona
15 days ago
I see your point, Tula. But I still think Inspection would be the best choice for detecting defects in the critical Bonus Program.
upvoted 0 times
...
India
2 months ago
I'd choose Walkthrough. It's a good balance between formality and efficiency, and the existing pool of review leaders can make it work well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chanel
2 months ago
Definitely go with Inspection. It's the most rigorous review type and will catch any critical defects in the Bonus Program.
upvoted 0 times
Ria
5 days ago
C) Walkthrough
upvoted 0 times
...
Josphine
7 days ago
A) Informal review
upvoted 0 times
...
Junita
9 days ago
B) Inspection
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nan
2 months ago
I think I would choose Inspection for reviewing the program.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel