Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ISTQB ATA Exam - Topic 6 Question 78 Discussion

Posted by Devon on Sep 16, 2024 at 02:55 PM

Supercar is an online vehicle sales website specializing in a single manufacturer's Sports Utility Vehicles (SUVs) and saloons. A vehicle has two key elements, power unit and body style. The manufacturer offers three choices of power unit: petrol, diesel and hybrid. There are 3 main body styles:

Saloon, Hatchback and SUV. SUVs only come as petrol and diesel options. Hybrid is available for Hatchback only. The site will allow an order to be processed if at least one of the chosen vehicle configuration is in stock, otherwise a message will be displayed asking the user to try again later.

As a tester you are asked to review the ''Supercar'' specification before starting to design the corresponding test cases.

Which of the comments below would you make?

[K3] 2 credits

Suggested Answer: D

Get Premium ATA Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
38 comments · newest first
EM
Emily 10 months ago
Wait, are SUVs really only petrol and diesel? That seems odd!
PA
Paris 11 months ago
It is not clear which message will be displayed when ''out of stock''
CO
Corrinne 11 months ago
Dependencies power unit and body styles are ambiguous
AM
Amie 11 months ago
Boundaries for stock levels are ambiguous
NA
Natalie 11 months ago
I have no comments, specification looks ok
TO
Toi 12 months ago
I have no comments, specification looks ok
RO
Roslyn 12 months ago
Dependencies power unit and body styles are ambiguous
LI
Lilli 12 months ago
It is not clear which message will be displayed when ''out of stock''
DU
Dulce 1 year ago
Boundaries for stock levels are ambiguous
AR
Armando 1 year ago
The question doesn't specify what message will be displayed when a vehicle is out of stock, that's an important detail I'd want to confirm.
BE
Bernardine 1 year ago
The dependencies between power units and body styles are not entirely clear to me, I'd need to get some more details on that.
HO
Howard 1 year ago
The boundaries for stock levels are a bit ambiguous, I'd want to clarify that before designing test cases.
CA
Casie 1 year ago
I think the specification is pretty clear, I don't have any major concerns about it.
YU
Yuette 1 year ago
This question seems straightforward, I'll carefully read through each option and select the three true statements.
RE
Regenia 2 years ago
Ah, I see, so Hybrids are only available for Hatchbacks. That's an interesting limitation. I wonder if the customers will be happy about that.
MI
Mignon 2 years ago
↳ replying to Regenia
Leandro: That could be a good idea to attract more customers.
MA
Maddie 2 years ago
↳ replying to Regenia
User 3: Maybe they should consider offering hybrids for SUVs too.
LE
Leandro 2 years ago
↳ replying to Regenia
User 2: I wonder if that will affect customer satisfaction.
SU
Sunny 2 years ago
↳ replying to Regenia
Yeah, it's interesting that hybrids are only for hatchbacks.
EZ
Ezekiel 2 years ago
I agree with Paris, the specification could be more clear about the expected behavior when a configuration is out of stock. What exactly will the message say?
KE
Kerry 2 years ago
↳ replying to Ezekiel
C) Dependencies power unit and body styles are ambiguous
DE
Deeann 2 years ago
↳ replying to Ezekiel
B) Boundaries for stock levels are ambiguous
AN
Annmarie 2 years ago
↳ replying to Ezekiel
A) I have no comments, specification looks ok
HE
Helaine 2 years ago
The dependencies between power unit and body style are a bit confusing. It's not immediately clear if all possible combinations are allowed or if there are some restrictions.
BE
Beckie 2 years ago
↳ replying to Helaine
D) It is not clear which message will be displayed when ''out of stock''
SK
Skye 2 years ago
↳ replying to Helaine
C) Dependencies power unit and body styles are ambiguous
LE
Lettie 2 years ago
↳ replying to Helaine
B) Boundaries for stock levels are ambiguous
BR
Brock 2 years ago
↳ replying to Helaine
A) I have no comments, specification looks ok
JO
Joesph 2 years ago
I would also add that option D is crucial. Knowing what message will be displayed is essential for user experience.
PA
Paris 2 years ago
I'm not sure about the boundaries for stock levels. Is there a minimum or maximum number of vehicles that should be in stock for each configuration?
CH
Chantay 2 years ago
The specification seems clear to me. The dependencies between power unit and body style are well defined, and the behavior when a configuration is out of stock is also specified.
VI
Vivienne 2 years ago
↳ replying to Chantay
C) Dependencies power unit and body styles are ambiguous
MA
Magda 2 years ago
↳ replying to Chantay
B) Boundaries for stock levels are ambiguous
ID
Idella 2 years ago
↳ replying to Chantay
A) I have no comments, specification looks ok
LO
Lonna 2 years ago
↳ replying to Chantay
Boundaries for stock levels are ambiguous
LO
Lonna 2 years ago
↳ replying to Chantay
I have no comments, specification looks ok
ST
Stefania 2 years ago
I agree with Britt. Without clear boundaries, it can lead to confusion during testing.
BR
Britt 2 years ago
I think option B is important. Boundaries for stock levels need to be clear.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel