New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ISTQB ATA Exam - Topic 6 Question 31 Discussion

Actual exam question for ISTQB's ATA exam
Question #: 31
Topic #: 6
[All ATA Questions]

Which of the following is the LEAST appropriate action to mitigate product risks for a web application?

[K3] 2 credits

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Solange at May 29, 2022, 10:42 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ATA Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Vicki
4 months ago
I disagree, all options are important, but C seems less relevant.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamie
4 months ago
Surprised that anyone would think using skilled testers isn't crucial!
upvoted 0 times
...
Buddy
4 months ago
Wait, isn't allocating more time to high-risk areas super important?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jestine
4 months ago
Totally agree, running tests in multiple environments doesn't really address product risks directly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsey
4 months ago
I think option C is the least effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
King
5 months ago
Allocating more time to high-risk areas feels like a good strategy, but I can't recall if that was considered less appropriate in our practice questions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eileen
5 months ago
I think running tests in multiple environments is crucial, so maybe option A could be the answer since it seems less impactful?
upvoted 0 times
...
Hassie
5 months ago
I remember we discussed how important it is to have skilled testers, but I'm not sure if that makes it the least appropriate action.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fernanda
5 months ago
I vaguely remember that initiating reviews of test design might not directly mitigate risks, so I'm leaning towards option A as the least appropriate action.
upvoted 0 times
...
Irving
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused on the best approach here. Should I be looking at the secure score recommendations, configuring the Defender for Cloud data connector, or adding a regulatory compliance standard? I'll need to think this through carefully to make sure I'm taking the right first step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lyndia
5 months ago
Ah, I see what they're asking. I've got a good strategy to tackle this question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micaela
5 months ago
I remember something about using client tools like HeidiSQL, but I can't recall if that's listed as a correct method or not.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kattie
5 months ago
I'm leaning towards using the same system image as the kickstart image. It seems to make sense to ensure compatibility during upgrades!
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel