Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ISTQB ATA Exam - Topic 5 Question 87 Discussion

Actual exam question for ISTQB's ATA exam
Question #: 87
Topic #: 5
[All ATA Questions]

As a test analyst you are gathering data to support accurate metrics. Which of the following metrics would be MOST appropriate to use to monitor product quality?

[K2] 1 credit

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Ernie at Mar 07, 2025, 08:56 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ATA Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Vi
4 months ago
I think product risks outstanding is super crucial, surprised it's not more highlighted!
upvoted 0 times
...
Denise
4 months ago
Wait, are we sure compliance to entry criteria is that relevant?
upvoted 0 times
...
Latricia
4 months ago
Tests run and passed is important too, but not as much.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luther
4 months ago
Totally agree, that's the best way to gauge quality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dianne
4 months ago
Defects found vs defects expected is key!
upvoted 0 times
...
Madonna
5 months ago
I recall a practice question where product risks were highlighted as key metrics, so I’m leaning towards that option for monitoring quality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kayleigh
5 months ago
Compliance to entry criteria seems important, but I feel like it might not give a complete picture of product quality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carri
5 months ago
I think tests run and tests passed is a common metric, but it might not capture the overall quality as well as some of the other options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elvera
5 months ago
I remember discussing how defects found versus defects expected can really show the product's quality, but I'm not entirely sure if it's the best choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brandon
5 months ago
I'm a little confused by this question. There are a few different quality metrics mentioned, and I'm not sure which one would be the most appropriate. I'll have to review my notes and think this through step-by-step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karol
5 months ago
Option A seems like the clear winner to me. Monitoring defects is the best way to track product quality, rather than just looking at tests passed or compliance to entry criteria.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zona
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'm trying to decide between A and E. Product risks seem important for quality, but defects found versus expected might be the more direct metric. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Van
5 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about quality metrics. I think the best option is A - defects found versus defects expected, as that directly measures product quality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Desmond
10 months ago
Defects expected? Sounds like my software development team has been making some wild promises again.
upvoted 0 times
Carlton
9 months ago
E) Product risks outstanding and new risks introduced
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashleigh
10 months ago
B) Tests run and tests passed
upvoted 0 times
...
Nickolas
10 months ago
A) Defects found versus defects expected
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jettie
11 months ago
Compliance to entry criteria? What is this, a beauty pageant? I'll take 'tests run and tests passed' any day.
upvoted 0 times
Adelle
9 months ago
Compliance to entry criteria is like setting the standards for the product quality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentin
9 months ago
I think 'product risks outstanding and new risks introduced' is crucial for monitoring quality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ruthann
10 months ago
Defects found versus defects expected is also important to consider for accurate metrics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ruth
11 months ago
I agree, 'tests run and tests passed' is a good metric to monitor product quality.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Skye
11 months ago
But don't you think monitoring defects found versus expected gives a better indication of the product's quality?
upvoted 0 times
...
Glendora
11 months ago
Well, if I was a defect, I'd much rather be 'expected' than 'found'! Option A for me.
upvoted 0 times
Samira
10 months ago
User 2: Definitely, it's important to track defects found versus expected.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ty
11 months ago
User 1: I agree, option A is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jannette
11 months ago
I was leaning towards E, since product risks are a key indicator of quality. But I suppose that's more focused on risk management than pure quality metrics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Odette
11 months ago
Option B looks the most straightforward to me. Tracking tests run and tests passed seems like a clear way to monitor product quality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
11 months ago
I disagree, I believe E) Product risks outstanding and new risks introduced is more important for monitoring product quality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Skye
12 months ago
I think A) Defects found versus defects expected would be the most appropriate metric.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel