Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ISTQB Exam ATA Topic 5 Question 87 Discussion

Actual exam question for ISTQB's ATA exam
Question #: 87
Topic #: 5
[All ATA Questions]

As a test analyst you are gathering data to support accurate metrics. Which of the following metrics would be MOST appropriate to use to monitor product quality?

[K2] 1 credit

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Ernie at Mar 07, 2025, 08:56 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ATA Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Desmond
3 months ago
Defects expected? Sounds like my software development team has been making some wild promises again.
upvoted 0 times
Carlton
1 months ago
E) Product risks outstanding and new risks introduced
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashleigh
2 months ago
B) Tests run and tests passed
upvoted 0 times
...
Nickolas
2 months ago
A) Defects found versus defects expected
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jettie
3 months ago
Compliance to entry criteria? What is this, a beauty pageant? I'll take 'tests run and tests passed' any day.
upvoted 0 times
Adelle
1 months ago
Compliance to entry criteria is like setting the standards for the product quality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentin
1 months ago
I think 'product risks outstanding and new risks introduced' is crucial for monitoring quality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ruthann
2 months ago
Defects found versus defects expected is also important to consider for accurate metrics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ruth
3 months ago
I agree, 'tests run and tests passed' is a good metric to monitor product quality.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Skye
3 months ago
But don't you think monitoring defects found versus expected gives a better indication of the product's quality?
upvoted 0 times
...
Glendora
3 months ago
Well, if I was a defect, I'd much rather be 'expected' than 'found'! Option A for me.
upvoted 0 times
Samira
2 months ago
User 2: Definitely, it's important to track defects found versus expected.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ty
3 months ago
User 1: I agree, option A is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jannette
3 months ago
I was leaning towards E, since product risks are a key indicator of quality. But I suppose that's more focused on risk management than pure quality metrics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Odette
3 months ago
Option B looks the most straightforward to me. Tracking tests run and tests passed seems like a clear way to monitor product quality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe E) Product risks outstanding and new risks introduced is more important for monitoring product quality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Skye
4 months ago
I think A) Defects found versus defects expected would be the most appropriate metric.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel