New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ISTQB ATA Exam - Topic 5 Question 82 Discussion

Actual exam question for ISTQB's ATA exam
Question #: 82
Topic #: 5
[All ATA Questions]

Consider the following description in a defect report ''Nasty bug trashed contents of new file that I created by formatting some text in symbol font, wasting my time.''

Which TWO of the following comments would you immediately make based on the defect description above?

[K4] 3 credits, 1 out of 2 correct 1 credit

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, B

by Valda at Nov 19, 2024, 05:41 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ATA Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Kirby
3 months ago
Possible duplicate? Really?
upvoted 0 times
...
Edelmira
3 months ago
Wait, how did the symbol font cause that?
upvoted 0 times
...
Essie
3 months ago
More than one defect in one report
upvoted 0 times
...
Vallie
4 months ago
Totally agree, needs to be neutralized
upvoted 0 times
...
Tyra
4 months ago
Steps to reproduce are unclear
upvoted 0 times
...
Penney
4 months ago
I wonder if this could be a possible duplicate of another issue we've seen before.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shay
4 months ago
I remember a similar question where we had to identify multiple defects in one report. This might be the case here too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kate
4 months ago
I'm not sure, but I feel like the steps to reproduce are pretty unclear. We need more details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Matthew
5 months ago
I think we should definitely point out that the report needs to be neutralized. It sounds really emotional.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernadine
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got a good handle on this. I'll go with the comments about unclear steps and potential duplication, since those seem like the most pressing issues based on the information provided.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maurine
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the "symbol font" part - not sure if that's relevant or just extra context. But the lack of isolation steps is definitely something I'd point out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lezlie
5 months ago
The steps to reproduce are a bit unclear, so I'll make sure to flag that. And the mention of a new file being trashed makes me wonder if there could be more than one defect in this report.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devora
5 months ago
Hmm, the description mentions a "nasty bug" and "wasted time", so I'm thinking the comments about neutralizing the issue and potential duplication could be relevant.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tuyet
5 months ago
This question seems straightforward. I'll focus on the key details in the defect description and try to identify the most relevant comments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Xuan
1 year ago
Ah, the classic 'wasting my time' complaint. Welcome to the world of software development, my friend.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorothea
1 year ago
Needs to be neutralized? I don't know, that sounds a bit dramatic. Maybe they just need to take a deep breath and approach this calmly.
upvoted 0 times
Wai
1 year ago
Needs to be neutralized? I don't know, that sounds a bit dramatic. Maybe they just need to take a deep breath and approach this calmly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leatha
1 year ago
Steps to reproduce are unclear. It's important to provide clear steps to help identify and fix the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Micah
1 year ago
More than one defect in one report? That's just sloppy. Let's break this down into smaller, more manageable issues.
upvoted 0 times
Zona
1 year ago
B) Steps to reproduce are unclear
upvoted 0 times
...
Gaston
1 year ago
A) Needs to be neutralized
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Arlyne
1 year ago
I think C) No attempt to isolate the defect is also important to mention.
upvoted 0 times
...
Earleen
1 year ago
I agree with Kristal, the steps to reproduce should be clear in a defect report.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shelton
1 year ago
Possible duplicate, huh? I bet someone else has reported this same issue. Time to do some digging in the bug tracker.
upvoted 0 times
Dion
1 year ago
Good idea, we should investigate further before jumping to conclusions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
1 year ago
Let's check the bug tracker to see if anyone else has reported this issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashanti
1 year ago
E) Possible duplicate
upvoted 0 times
...
Kayleigh
1 year ago
A) Needs to be neutralized
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Deeanna
1 year ago
No attempt to isolate the defect? Sounds like the developer just threw their hands up in the air. Not very helpful for the QA team.
upvoted 0 times
Lorita
1 year ago
B) Steps to reproduce are unclear
upvoted 0 times
...
Aliza
1 year ago
A) Needs to be neutralized
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Deandrea
1 year ago
The steps to reproduce are definitely unclear. How are we supposed to fix this bug if we don't know how to trigger it?
upvoted 0 times
Leonie
1 year ago
C) No attempt to isolate the defect
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacqueline
1 year ago
B) Steps to reproduce are unclear
upvoted 0 times
...
Alpha
1 year ago
A) Needs to be neutralized
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kristal
1 year ago
I would say B) Steps to reproduce are unclear.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel