MENU
Tax system
A tax system needs to be updated due to new legislation. For a person with a salary of less than 20.000 and who is married, the tax needs to be re-calculated. If the person also has more than two and less than five children, an additional 10% reduction is applicable.
Applying equivalence partitioning to the ''Tax System'' specification, which of the following set of equivalence classes is most effective in testing the processing the number of children?
[K3] 2 credits
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium ATA Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
21 comments · newest first
MY
Myra
2 days ago
I think option B is the best. It covers the range well.
TR
Troy
7 days ago
B is definitely the best choice.
LA
Lashon
12 days ago
We need to focus on valid cases.
LO
Louis
17 days ago
I still think A is safer.
LO
Loise
23 days ago
Exactly, 5 is the max for kids.
WI
Willard
28 days ago
True, B is more accurate.
LA
Lashon
1 month ago
But 6 isn't valid for the reduction.
LO
Louis
1 month ago
I prefer A. It includes 2 and 4.
TR
Troy
1 month ago
It covers the range for the reduction.
WI
Willard
2 months ago
Why B?
LO
Loise
2 months ago
I think option B makes sense.
TR
Troy
2 months ago
This question is tricky.
SH
Shenika
2 months ago
Not sure if this is the best way to test it, feels off.
RU
Rupert
2 months ago
Totally agree with B, it fits the criteria perfectly!
LA
Lashaunda
2 months ago
Wait, why only 2-5 kids? What about 1 or more than 5?
JE
Jestine
3 months ago
I think A is better, 6 kids shouldn't be included.
MA
Malcom
3 months ago
Option B seems right, covers the range for the reduction.
CH
Charlena
3 months ago
I think I saw a similar question in our practice tests, and it emphasized testing within the limits. So, I lean towards option B as the most effective choice.
NA
Nadine
3 months ago
I’m a bit confused about whether we should include values outside the specified range. I feel like option A might not be right since it has 6 children.
LO
Lorrine
3 months ago
I remember practicing equivalence partitioning, and I think we should include the boundary values. So, maybe option B with 2, 4, and 5 children makes sense?
BL
Blair
4 months ago
I think we need to focus on the range of children mentioned in the question. It said more than two and less than five, so I’m not sure if options with 6 children are valid.