Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ISTQB ATA Exam - Topic 1 Question 101 Discussion

Posted by Avery on Mar 02, 2026 at 10:16 AM

You are starting to review some of the incident reports that have been submitted as a result of test execution.

Which THREE of the comments would be your main findings when you have reviewed the following incident report?

[K4] 3 credits, 2 out of 3 correct 1 credit

Suggested Answer: A, B, E

Get Premium ATA Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
26 comments · newest first
RO
Rodrigo 1 month ago
D) Actual cause is missing
FR
Freida 1 month ago
C) Both severity and priority do not make sense
CA
Casandra 2 months ago
B) Ambiguous description
TO
Tonja 2 months ago
A) Should have been two defect reports
TW
Twana 2 months ago
D) Actual cause is missing
DE
Dean 2 months ago
C) Both severity and priority do not make sense
CH
Chan 2 months ago
B) Ambiguous description
CH
Chauncey 2 months ago
A) Should have been two defect reports
LY
Lynda 3 months ago
D) Actual cause is missing
CH
Christiane 3 months ago
C) Both severity and priority do not make sense
LA
Laquanda 3 months ago
B) Ambiguous description
PA
Paulina 3 months ago
A) Should have been two defect reports
YO
Yolando 3 months ago
No date to fix? That's surprising!
BE
Bettina 4 months ago
Missing actual cause is a big deal!
GI
Gianna 5 months ago
Wait, how can both severity and priority not make sense?
SH
Shanice 5 months ago
Totally agree, the description is super vague.
CO
Cory 5 months ago
Should have been two defect reports
PE
Peggie 6 months ago
Missing actual cause? That seems odd.
EL
Eleonora 6 months ago
Ambiguous description is a big issue.
AN
Annelle 6 months ago
Wait, how can both severity and priority not make sense?
TH
Thora 6 months ago
Totally agree, that makes sense.
WI
Willie 6 months ago
Should have been two defect reports
LA
Lashawnda 6 months ago
I’m leaning towards A, that there should have been two defect reports. I’ve seen similar questions before, and it’s often a point of confusion.
CH
Chana 7 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of having a clear actual cause in our reports, so I’d go with D. It seems crucial for understanding the issue.
BE
Ben 7 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like C about severity and priority not making sense could be a key finding too. It’s something we practiced in class.
RE
Reid 7 months ago
I think option B, the ambiguous description, is definitely a common issue in incident reports. It makes it hard to understand the problem.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel