Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ISTQB ATA Exam - Topic 1 Question 101 Discussion

You are starting to review some of the incident reports that have been submitted as a result of test execution.Which THREE of the comments would be your main findings when you have reviewed the following incident report?[K4] 3 credits, 2 out of 3 correct 1 credit
A) Should have been two defect reports and B) Ambiguous description and E) Reproducibility is not indicated
C) Both severity and priority do not make sense
D) Actual cause is missing
F) Defect type is missing
G) Date to be fixed not defined

ISTQB ATA Exam - Topic 1 Question 101 Discussion

Actual exam question for ISTQB's ATA exam
Question #: 101
Topic #: 1
[All ATA Questions]

You are starting to review some of the incident reports that have been submitted as a result of test execution.

Which THREE of the comments would be your main findings when you have reviewed the following incident report?

[K4] 3 credits, 2 out of 3 correct 1 credit

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, B, E

by Avery at Mar 02, 2026, 10:16 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ATA Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Laquanda
6 hours ago
B) Ambiguous description
upvoted 0 times
...
Paulina
5 days ago
A) Should have been two defect reports
upvoted 0 times
...
Yolando
11 days ago
No date to fix? That's surprising!
upvoted 0 times
...
Bettina
16 days ago
Missing actual cause is a big deal!
upvoted 0 times
...
Gianna
2 months ago
Wait, how can both severity and priority not make sense?
upvoted 0 times
...
Shanice
2 months ago
Totally agree, the description is super vague.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cory
2 months ago
Should have been two defect reports
upvoted 0 times
...
Peggie
3 months ago
Missing actual cause? That seems odd.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eleonora
3 months ago
Ambiguous description is a big issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annelle
3 months ago
Wait, how can both severity and priority not make sense?
upvoted 0 times
...
Thora
3 months ago
Totally agree, that makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willie
3 months ago
Should have been two defect reports
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawnda
3 months ago
I’m leaning towards A, that there should have been two defect reports. I’ve seen similar questions before, and it’s often a point of confusion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chana
4 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of having a clear actual cause in our reports, so I’d go with D. It seems crucial for understanding the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ben
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like C about severity and priority not making sense could be a key finding too. It’s something we practiced in class.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reid
4 months ago
I think option B, the ambiguous description, is definitely a common issue in incident reports. It makes it hard to understand the problem.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel