iSQI IREB_CPRE_FL Exam - Topic 4 Question 31 Discussion

Actual exam question for iSQI's IREB_CPRE_FL exam

Question #: 31
Topic #: 4

You are employed as a requirements engineer in a company that develops control software for electric motors. During your work it becomes increasingly evident that the developers are very well aware of the necessary requirements, even though the requirements are not documented in their entirety. Nevertheless, you decide to document requirements systematically. Which two of the following arguments justifies this step? (2 Points)

Documenting requirements systematically is important, because...

A... implementation without documented requirements is not possible.

B... non-documented requirements are difficult to negotiate between the stakeholders.

C... the coverage of the requirements by means of test cases cannot be checked.

D... documented requirements are also good requirements.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C, D

by Bok at May 06, 2022, 07:31 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium IREB_CPRE_FL Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Keshia

4 months ago

Totally agree with B. Clear communication is key in any project!

upvoted 0 times

...

Adolph

4 months ago

Wait, are we really saying D is true? Just because it's documented doesn't mean it's good!

upvoted 0 times

...

Nada

4 months ago

C makes a lot of sense too. Testing needs clear requirements!

upvoted 0 times

...

Raylene

4 months ago

I disagree, A seems more critical. Without docs, how can you even start?

upvoted 0 times

...

Gaynell

5 months ago

B is spot on! Non-documented requirements can lead to chaos.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jennie

5 months ago

I’m a bit confused about option A; I thought implementation could happen without documentation, but maybe it’s riskier that way?

upvoted 0 times

...

Catherin

5 months ago

I practiced a similar question where we talked about the importance of documentation, and I feel like option D could be a valid choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nan

5 months ago

I'm not entirely sure, but I think option C might be relevant too since testing relies on clear requirements.

upvoted 0 times

...

Eric

5 months ago

I remember discussing how undocumented requirements can lead to misunderstandings among stakeholders, so I think option B makes sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hubert

5 months ago

A dashboard seems like the obvious choice here to provide a high-level overview for the project sponsor and stakeholders.

upvoted 0 times

...

Amber

5 months ago

I think this question is asking about the definition of a P3O, which is a Project, Programme and Portfolio Office. I'm pretty confident that the correct answer is C, as a P3O is supposed to provide integration with governance arrangements and other corporate support functions.

upvoted 0 times

...