New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

iSQI CTFL_Syll2018 Exam - Topic 8 Question 115 Discussion

Actual exam question for iSQI's CTFL_Syll2018 exam
Question #: 115
Topic #: 8
[All CTFL_Syll2018 Questions]

Which of the following is a correct statement about informal reviews?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

According to the ISTQB Certified Tester Foundation Level Syllabus Version 2018, an informal review is a type of static testing technique that does not follow a defined process and has no formal or minimal entry and exit criteria. The usefulness of an informal review is highly variable and strongly dependent on the reviewers, who may be chosen arbitrarily. Informal reviews are often performed as part of the development process, before the work product is submitted for formal review. The moderator of an informal review may or may not be the author of the reviewed material. An informal review can have a positive impact on the quality of the product, as well as on the level of knowledge of the reviewers.


by Lazaro at Aug 13, 2025, 07:48 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CTFL_Syll2018 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Kerrie
3 months ago
Wait, are we sure about B? That seems too strict for informal reviews.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roxanne
3 months ago
C makes sense, having the author as the moderator could bias the feedback.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marjory
3 months ago
I disagree with D, informal reviews can really help improve quality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bronwyn
3 months ago
A is spot on, I've seen it vary a lot based on the reviewers' expertise.
upvoted 0 times
...
Natalie
3 months ago
A is definitely true, it really depends on who reviews it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elmira
4 months ago
D seems off to me; I thought informal reviews could actually help improve quality, even if they aren't formal.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilburn
4 months ago
I think I read somewhere that the moderator shouldn't be the author to ensure impartiality, which makes me think C could be the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lai
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like informal reviews can be done by anyone, not just the author. That makes me lean away from B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pamella
4 months ago
I remember discussing how the effectiveness of informal reviews can really depend on who is doing the reviewing, so I think A might be correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicia
4 months ago
I'm pretty confident I know the answer to this one. Informal reviews are meant to be flexible and provide quick feedback, not follow a strict process. So the first option about the usefulness being highly variable seems like the best fit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alethea
5 months ago
Okay, I've got a strategy for this. Informal reviews are typically less structured than formal ones, so the usefulness likely depends a lot on the reviewers involved. I'll rule out the options that seem too rigid or absolute about the process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Flo
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The options seem to cover a range of statements about informal reviews, but I'm not totally clear on the nuances between them. I'll need to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felice
5 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about informal reviews. I'll focus on understanding the key differences between the options and choose the one that best matches the description of informal reviews.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dalene
5 months ago
C) The moderator of an informal review should not be the author of the reviewed material.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tenesha
7 months ago
A) The usefulness of an informal review is highly variable and strongly dependent on the reviewers.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel