Halloween Special 2026! Get Up to 25% OFF Practice Questions! Limited Time - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

iSQI CTFL_Syll2018 Exam - Topic 5 Question 125 Discussion

Posted by Erick on May 14, 2026 at 05:34 AM

An iPhone application identifies and counts all purchases of a particular product from a shopping website. The application incorrectly counts purchase attempts by including both failed attempts, and also those where the purchase was terminated by the user before completion. Testing has identified that the problem was located in the 'purchase identification' module, where the first stage in the purchasing process was counted, rather than a successful confirmed purchase.

Which of the following statements correctly identifies what has happened? [K2]

Suggested Answer: A

The application failed because of a defect in the purchase identification module caused by a programmer mistake or an error in the specification. A defect is a flaw or imperfection in a software product that causes it to fail to meet its requirements or expectations. A failure is an event or behavior of a software product that deviates from its requirements or expectations. An error is a human action or decision that produces a defect. A mistake is an incorrect action or decision that leads to an error. In this case, the application failed because it incorrectly counted purchase attempts, which was a defect in the purchase identification module. The defect was caused by either a programmer mistake (such as writing wrong code) or an error in the specification (such as defining wrong requirements). A detailed explanation of defects, failures, errors, and mistakes can be found in [A Study Guide to the ISTQB Foundation Level 2018 Syllabus], pages 5-6.


Get Premium CTFL_Syll2018 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
24 comments · newest first
FE
Felix 4 days ago
D feels too vague. We need specifics about the module.
EL
Elvera 9 days ago
C is the best choice. It connects the specification mistake to the defect.
ST
Steffanie 14 days ago
I prefer B. It highlights the programmer's error clearly.
NO
Noah 19 days ago
I think option A makes sense. Programmer mistakes happen.
JU
Judy 24 days ago
B is more specific about the programmer's role in the error.
DE
Deandrea 30 days ago
I feel like A covers everything. It's straightforward.
TH
Thaddeus 1 month ago
D is too vague. It doesn't explain the root cause well.
RA
Rasheeda 1 month ago
C makes sense too. It connects the specification issue to the defect.
TO
Toshia 2 months ago
I prefer B. It clearly states the error led to a mistake.
JO
Johnson 2 months ago
I think option A is the best. It highlights the programmer's mistake.
GO
Goldie 2 months ago
I agree with A; it seems like a specification error too.
JO
Josefa 2 months ago
Not sure if it’s just a programmer mistake or something deeper.
LO
Louann 2 months ago
Wait, how did they not catch that during testing?
LI
Lina 2 months ago
I think it’s definitely option D.
FR
France 3 months ago
Sounds like a classic case of a programming bug.
HU
Huey 3 months ago
A bug in the module causing a fault? Seems pretty straightforward.
CL
Clement 3 months ago
Wait, so they counted failed purchases too? That's surprising!
KI
Kimberely 3 months ago
I disagree, it seems more like a specification issue to me.
CH
Cherry 3 months ago
I think it's definitely a defect in the module.
DE
Desire 3 months ago
Sounds like a classic case of a programmer error.
WI
William 4 months ago
I feel like option B could be correct too, since it highlights the programmer's error leading to a mistake. But I can't quite remember the exact definitions we studied.
JU
Julian 4 months ago
I'm a bit confused about the terms used. Isn't a bug just another word for a defect? Maybe option D is too simplistic?
MA
Mariann 4 months ago
I remember practicing a question similar to this, and I think option C makes sense because it talks about the defect being caused by a mistake in the specification.
ST
Stephaine 5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think option A sounds like it could be right since it mentions both a defect and a programmer mistake.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel