iSQI CTFL_Syll2018 Exam - Topic 2 Question 5 Discussion

Actual exam question for iSQI's CTFL_Syll2018 exam

Question #: 5
Topic #: 2

[All CTFL_Syll2018 Questions]

Your agile project has scheduled a final sprint before release to fix and re-test all open defects with a priority level of 3 or above.

The following defect report shows the defect fields that are currently being captured on the system.

Title: Unable to add excursions to pre-paid cruises

Date raised: 21/05/18

Author: Emma Rigby

Status: Fixed

What occurred: I went to book an excursion for a pre-paid cruise but received an error message saying, 'Facility not available'. I can book excursions on cruises that have not yet been fully paid.

What should have occurred: Requirement 3.12 says clearly that customers can add excursions after cruises have been fully paid so the facility should have been available (when an additional amount may now need to be paid).

Priority: 2

Software build: 2.1

Test level: System test

Environment details: System test 3

Which of ONE of the following additional defect report fields would be MOST beneficial for the sprint team to add?

ASeverity.

BTest Script Id.

CActual results.

DExpected results.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

by Yoko at May 09, 2022, 06:51 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CTFL_Syll2018 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Lelia

4 months ago

I raised that defect, and I still don't get why it was marked as fixed.

upvoted 0 times

...

Erick

4 months ago

Wait, why wasn't "Severity" considered? Seems important too!

upvoted 0 times

...

Leatha

4 months ago

Not sure if that's the best choice, though. What about "Actual results"?

upvoted 0 times

...

Maynard

4 months ago

Totally agree, that would make it clearer for everyone.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kindra

5 months ago

I think adding "Expected results" would help clarify issues.

upvoted 0 times

...

Emerson

5 months ago

I feel like we had a practice question about defect fields, and expected results stood out as crucial for understanding the issue. It might be the best choice here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Veda

5 months ago

I'm not entirely sure, but I think severity might be useful too? It could help prioritize defects better, especially if we have limited time in the sprint.

upvoted 0 times

...

Reita

5 months ago

I remember we discussed the importance of capturing expected results in defect reports. It helps clarify what the system should do versus what it actually did.

upvoted 0 times

...

Eileen

5 months ago

I wonder if adding actual results could also be beneficial? It seems like it would provide context, but I think expected results might be more critical for this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Johna

5 months ago

Database persistence might work, but I'm worried about the performance impact. File persistence could be a good compromise, but I need to make sure it can handle the HA requirement.

upvoted 0 times

...

Maryann

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about the distinction between restricted and confidential here. I'll need to think this through carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carmen

5 months ago

The wireless intrusion prevention system could potentially help identify the interference, but I think the Cisco spectrum expert is the most direct and effective solution for this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...