Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

iSQI CTFL_Syll_4.0 Exam - Topic 3 Question 41 Discussion

Which of the following statements about the shift-left approach is true?
D) Continuous integration supports shift-left in testing as it can reduce the time between the introduction of a defect and its detection, thereby reducing the cost to fix it
A) Shift-left in testing can be implemented only in Agile/DevOps frameworks, as it relies completely on automated testing activities performed within a continuous integration process
B) Performance testing performed during component testing, is a form of shift-left in testing that avoids planning and executing costly end-to-end testing at the system test level in a production-like environment
C) Shift-left in testing can be implemented in several ways to find functional defects early in the lifecycle, but it cannot be relied upon to find defects associated with non-functional characteristics

iSQI CTFL_Syll_4.0 Exam - Topic 3 Question 41 Discussion

Actual exam question for iSQI's CTFL_Syll_4.0 exam
Question #: 41
Topic #: 3
[All CTFL_Syll_4.0 Questions]

Which of the following statements about the shift-left approach is true?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

This answer is correct because shift-left in testing is an approach that aims to perform testing activities as early as possible in the software development lifecycle, in order to find and fix defects faster and cheaper, and to improve the quality of the software product. Continuous integration is a practice that supports shift-left in testing, as it involves integrating and testing the software components frequently, usually several times a day, using automated tools and processes. Continuous integration can reduce the time between the introduction of a defect and its detection, thereby reducing the cost to fix it and the risk of accumulating defects that could affect the functionality or performance of the software product.Reference: ISTQB Foundation Level Syllabus v4.0, Section 3.1.1.3, Section 3.2.1.3


by Alyce at Aug 03, 2025, 06:27 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CTFL_Syll_4.0 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Jestine
8 months ago
Wait, can shift-left really cover all types of defects? Sounds too good to be true.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hubert
9 months ago
I’m not sure about that non-functional defects claim in C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ressie
9 months ago
B is spot on, performance testing early saves a lot of headaches later!
upvoted 0 times
...
Adrianna
9 months ago
Totally agree, CI really helps catch defects early!
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherron
9 months ago
Shift-left can definitely be used outside Agile/DevOps.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catrice
9 months ago
Continuous integration definitely supports shift-left by catching defects early, which I think is crucial for reducing fixing costs. That makes sense to me!
upvoted 0 times
...
Pansy
10 months ago
I feel like shift-left can help with functional defects, but I’m uncertain about its effectiveness for non-functional issues. That part is a bit fuzzy for me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
10 months ago
I think performance testing during component testing is a good example of shift-left, but I can't recall if it really avoids costly end-to-end testing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tyra
10 months ago
I remember studying that shift-left is about finding defects earlier, but I'm not sure if it only applies to Agile/DevOps. That seems too limiting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dong
10 months ago
I'm not entirely sure about the non-functional characteristics part in option C. Does that mean the shift-left approach can't be used to find performance or security issues? I'll have to double-check that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fausto
10 months ago
Okay, I think I've got it. The shift-left approach is about finding defects earlier, which can reduce the cost of fixing them. Option D captures that idea well, so I'll go with that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused. The question mentions Agile/DevOps frameworks, but I'm not sure if that's a requirement for the shift-left approach. I'll have to think about this one a bit more.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaun
11 months ago
I'm pretty confident about this one. The shift-left approach is all about testing earlier in the development lifecycle, so option D seems to be the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brandon
1 year ago
D is the way to go! Continuous integration is key to shifting left and catching defects early on. Saves a lot of time and money in the long run.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nathan
1 year ago
I think option B is the correct answer. Performing performance testing during component testing is a great way to shift-left and avoid costly end-to-end testing later on.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rozella
1 year ago
I see your point, Jettie. Continuous integration does support shift-left testing
upvoted 0 times
...
Hollis
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think B could also be a valid answer
upvoted 0 times
...
Jettie
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is D
upvoted 0 times
...
Rozella
1 year ago
I think the answer is A
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel