Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

iSQI CTFL_Syll_4.0 Exam - Topic 3 Question 40 Discussion

Posted by Arletta on Jul 08, 2025 at 10:55 AM

Consider an estimation session in which a six-member Agile team (Membl,..., Memb6) uses the planning poker technique to estimate a user story (in story points). The team members will use a set of cards with the following values: 1. 2, 3, 5, 8,13, 21. Below is the outcome of the first round of estimation for this session:

Membl = 3 Memb2 = 3 Memb3 = 3

Memb4 = 21 Memb5 = 3 Memb6 = 1

Which of the following answers best describes how the estimation session should proceed?

Suggested Answer: D

Planning poker is a consensus-based estimation technique used in Agile. It involves team members selecting cards with their estimate for a user story, then discussing the differences in estimates.

Option A: Incorrect. While three-point estimation is valid, planning poker focuses on team consensus rather than individual estimation techniques.

Option B: Incorrect. The goal of planning poker is not to force unanimity but to reach a reasonable consensus.

Option C: Incorrect. Averaging estimates is not how planning poker works.

Option D: Correct. The members with the highest and lowest estimates discuss their reasoning to foster understanding and adjust estimates accordingly in subsequent rounds.


Get Premium CTFL_Syll_4.0 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
14 comments · newest first
CA
Carin 10 months ago
Just a reminder, the cards are 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21.
GE
Gerri 10 months ago
I think we should go with option B for sure.
AZ
Azzie 10 months ago
Seems like a huge gap in estimates!
RI
Ricarda 10 months ago
Wait, how can Memb4 think it's 21? That’s wild!
JA
James 11 months ago
Totally agree with D, we need to discuss those extremes.
LA
Larae 11 months ago
I think it's crucial to hear from Memb4 and Memb6 about their estimates. It could help clarify the situation before we estimate again, which aligns with option D.
HE
Heike 11 months ago
I feel like using the three-point estimation technique is something we covered, but I can't recall if we should apply it here. Option A seems a bit off to me.
GE
Geraldine 11 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think we might have practiced something similar where we just kept estimating until everyone agreed. That sounds like option B, right?
GE
Geoffrey 11 months ago
I remember we discussed that when there's a wide range of estimates, it's important to have a conversation to understand the reasoning behind them. So, I think option D makes sense.
BE
Bette 12 months ago
Hmm, I'm leaning towards trying another round of estimation. Getting everyone on the same page seems important here.
LE
Lera 12 months ago
I'm pretty confident my estimate of 21 is accurate, but I'm open to hearing the others' perspectives. We need to work through this as a team.
WI
Wilda 12 months ago
I think the key is to get everyone to explain their reasoning, like the question suggests. That should help us converge on a shared understanding.
SE
Selene 1 year ago
I'm a bit confused by the different estimates. I'm not sure if we should go with the average or try another round of estimation.
LI
Ling 1 year ago
This one's tricky, but I think we need to keep discussing until we reach a consensus. The wide range of estimates suggests we're not all on the same page yet.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel