MENU
Which of the following performance tests could be best considered to be the opposite to the endurance test when comparing the duration of the tests?
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium CTFL-PT Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
12 comments · newest first
DO
Donette
12 months ago
Wait, I thought endurance was all about long durations!
AR
Arlene
12 months ago
Load tests are usually longer, right?
MY
My
12 months ago
Not so sure about that, scalability tests can also be quick.
SH
Sheridan
1 year ago
Totally agree, spike tests are short and intense!
KA
Kanisha
1 year ago
I think the spike test is the opposite of endurance.
CE
Celestine
1 year ago
I have a vague memory that the spike test is indeed about sudden increases in load, which could make it the best choice here.
ME
Merissa
1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think scalability tests look at how systems handle increased loads over time, which doesn't seem like the opposite of endurance.
LE
Leatha
1 year ago
I remember endurance tests are about long durations, so maybe the spike test is the opposite since it focuses on short bursts of activity?
MO
Mona
1 year ago
I practiced a question similar to this, and I think the concurrency test might be about handling multiple users at once, but it doesn't feel like the opposite of endurance either.
LA
Laquanda
1 year ago
Okay, let's see. Tips and complaints, review of vendor ownership files, and interviews with purchasing personnel all seem like valid methods. I'm not sure about underbillings of assets though.
MA
Marsha
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not totally sure about this one. I'll have to think it through carefully before selecting an answer.
GE
Gearldine
1 year ago
I'm pretty sure the Financial Intelligence Unit updates would trigger system changes. They set the official risk indicators, right?