Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

iSQI CTFL-PT_D Exam - Topic 6 Question 39 Discussion

Identify the correspondences between the aspects (listed from 1 to 4) and factors to be considered (listed from A to D) when selecting performance testing tools.1. Compatibility.2. Scalability.3. Understandability.4. Monitoring.1. Level of technical knowledge needed to use the tool.2. Correlation of the monitoring with the defined transactions.3. Protocols.4. Ability to generate load from multiple points of presence.SELECT ONE OPTION
A) 1C-2D-3A-4B.
B) 1B-2D-3A-4C.
C) 1D-2C-3A-4B.
D) 1C-2D-3B-4A.

iSQI CTFL-PT_D Exam - Topic 6 Question 39 Discussion

Actual exam question for iSQI's CTFL-PT_D exam
Question #: 39
Topic #: 6
[All CTFL-PT_D Questions]

Identify the correspondences between the aspects (listed from 1 to 4) and factors to be considered (listed from A to D) when selecting performance testing tools.

1. Compatibility.

2. Scalability.

3. Understandability.

4. Monitoring.

1. Level of technical knowledge needed to use the tool.

2. Correlation of the monitoring with the defined transactions.

3. Protocols.

4. Ability to generate load from multiple points of presence.

SELECT ONE OPTION

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

The correct associations between the aspects and factors to be considered when selecting performance testing tools are:

1. Compatibility: Protocols. (C)

2. Scalability: Ability to generate load from multiple points of presence. (D)

3. Understandability: Level of technical knowledge needed to use the tool. (A)

4. Monitoring: Correlation of the monitoring with the defined transactions. (B)


* ISTQB Performance Testing Syllabus

* ISTQB Glossary

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Keva
2 days ago
4B for monitoring? That seems off to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Christene
7 days ago
I’m leaning towards option B, feels right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elza
12 days ago
Wait, is 3A really the best fit for understandability?
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
17 days ago
Totally agree, scalability should be 2D!
upvoted 0 times
...
Beata
23 days ago
I think 1C makes sense for compatibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashlyn
28 days ago
Monitoring should definitely correlate with defined transactions, so I guess that’s 4B? I hope I’m on the right track!
upvoted 0 times
...
Layla
1 month ago
For understandability, I feel like it connects to the level of technical knowledge, which could be 3A. But I could be mixing things up.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josefa
1 month ago
I remember something about scalability needing to do with generating load from multiple points, so that might be 2D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pura
1 month ago
I think compatibility relates to protocols, so maybe 1C? But I'm not entirely sure about the others.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel