Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

iSQI CTFL-AuT Exam - Topic 4 Question 55 Discussion

Your company produces electric windows and corresponding control units. The newest control unit for electric windows has repeatedly been problematic, which you think result from issues In the requirements, in particular, you noticed Bee following requirements in your first review.Which of the following requirements for the system test violates at least one of the quality criteria of the ISO/IEC/IEEE 29148:2011 ?ID; 12. When the central lock is activated, then all windows are automatically closed.ID; 37 Given: the ignition q activated. When the button tor a window is pressed down, then the window moves down.ID; 85: Given: the window moves up. When the window encounters resistance, then the window ttng motor stops.ID; 142; Given: a door is open When the button for a window is pressed then the message M-85 is sent to the control unit
C) The requirement 12 is ambiguous.
A) The requirement 85 is not atomic
B) The requirement 37 is Inconsistent on system level.
D) The requirement 142 is not verifiable on system level

iSQI CTFL-AuT Exam - Topic 4 Question 55 Discussion

Actual exam question for iSQI's CTFL-AuT exam
Question #: 55
Topic #: 4
[All CTFL-AuT Questions]

Your company produces electric windows and corresponding control units. The newest control unit for electric windows has repeatedly been problematic, which you think result from issues In the requirements, in particular, you noticed Bee following requirements in your first review.

Which of the following requirements for the system test violates at least one of the quality criteria of the ISO/IEC/IEEE 29148:2011 ?

ID; 12. When the central lock is activated, then all windows are automatically closed.

ID; 37 Given: the ignition q activated. When the button tor a window is pressed down, then the window moves down.

ID; 85: Given: the window moves up. When the window encounters resistance, then the window ttng motor stops.

ID; 142; Given: a door is open When the button for a window is pressed then the message M-85 is sent to the control unit

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

https://www.automotivespice.com/fileadmin/software-download/Automotive_SPICE_PAM_30.pdf


by Renea at Sep 15, 2024, 09:37 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CTFL-AuT Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Georgiann
9 months ago
Requirement 12 is a classic case of poor wording.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ocie
9 months ago
Wait, how can requirement 142 not be verifiable? That sounds off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katlyn
9 months ago
Requirement 85 seems fine to me, not sure what the fuss is about.
upvoted 0 times
...
Whitney
10 months ago
I think requirement 37 is inconsistent too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sarah
10 months ago
Requirement 12 is definitely ambiguous.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louvenia
10 months ago
I'm leaning towards requirement 142 being non-verifiable, but I need to double-check what makes a requirement verifiable at the system level.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elenore
10 months ago
Requirement 12 seems ambiguous to me; I recall that ambiguity can lead to different interpretations, which isn't good.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamera
10 months ago
I think requirement 37 could be inconsistent at the system level, especially if the ignition isn't always on when the button is pressed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Launa
11 months ago
I remember discussing how requirement 85 might not be atomic, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the main issue here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tien
11 months ago
Requirement 142 has me a bit stumped. How can we verify that on the system level? Might need to do some deeper analysis there.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dante
11 months ago
Requirement 85 seems a bit complex. Is it really atomic, or is there more going on there? I'll need to break that one down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vivan
11 months ago
Requirement 37 is interesting. I wonder if there could be some inconsistencies on the system level, like if the ignition is off but the window still moves down. Gotta think that through.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aaron
11 months ago
Okay, let's see here. Requirement 12 seems a bit ambiguous to me - what exactly does "automatically closed" mean? I'll need to dig into that one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
11 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'll need to carefully review each requirement and think about how they align with the ISO/IEC/IEEE 29148:2011 quality criteria.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delsie
11 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. I believe the key is using the --new option with either a device path or an NFS path. I'll double-check the other options just to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julie
1 year ago
Looks like the developers were having a bit too much fun with their requirements. 'M-85' - is that some kind of secret code for 'windows not working'?
upvoted 0 times
...
Crista
1 year ago
Requirement 142 is not verifiable on the system level. How do you test a 'message M-85' being sent to the control unit? That's a bit vague.
upvoted 0 times
Merlyn
1 year ago
C) The requirement 12 is ambiguous.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amber
1 year ago
B) The requirement 37 is inconsistent on system level.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tanesha
1 year ago
A) The requirement 85 is not atomic
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilbert
1 year ago
C) The requirement 12 is ambiguous.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alpha
1 year ago
B) The requirement 37 is inconsistent on system level.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nieves
1 year ago
A) The requirement 85 is not atomic
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Estrella
1 year ago
Requirement 12 is definitely ambiguous. It doesn't specify what 'central lock' means or how it's related to the windows.
upvoted 0 times
Merlyn
1 year ago
D) The requirement 142 is not verifiable on system level
upvoted 0 times
...
Franchesca
1 year ago
C) The requirement 12 is ambiguous.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ruthann
1 year ago
B) The requirement 37 is Inconsistent on system level.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronnie
1 year ago
A) The requirement 85 is not atomic
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Otis
1 year ago
I agree, requirement 37 is a bit inconsistent. It doesn't specify what should happen if the ignition is not activated.
upvoted 0 times
Dalene
1 year ago
User 2: I think so too. It needs to be more clear.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maynard
1 year ago
User 1: Requirement 37 is definitely inconsistent.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gearldine
1 year ago
Requirement 85 seems to be the issue here. It's not atomic, as it's got multiple conditions packed into a single requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nydia
1 year ago
I believe requirement 37 is also inconsistent on a system level.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittani
1 year ago
I agree, it's not atomic and could lead to issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
King
1 year ago
I think requirement 85 violates the quality criteria.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel