Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

iSQI Exam CTFL-AT Topic 1 Question 27 Discussion

Actual exam question for iSQI's CTFL-AT exam
Question #: 27
Topic #: 1
[All CTFL-AT Questions]

During a retrospective, which of the following items would be the LEAST effective to generate discussions on process improvement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by My at May 20, 2024, 06:14 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CTFL-AT Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Leoma
1 years ago
Hold up, option D? Seriously? That's like throwing a grenade into the retrospective. Better stick to the technical issues, ya know, the boring stuff that actually matters.
upvoted 0 times
...
Terrilyn
1 years ago
Hmm, I'd say option D is the least effective. Who wants to hear about the 'disruptive and lazy' tester? That's just asking for a comedy routine, not a productive retrospective.
upvoted 0 times
Lenna
1 years ago
C) The automation tests failed frequently without any logs to help in debugging the failure reason.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosita
1 years ago
B) For the last sprint the estimated and actual effort were much higher than the team capacity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wava
1 years ago
A) The build process was slow and this often caused delays waiting for the build to complete.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Daniel
1 years ago
Option A is the least effective. Slow build processes are a common problem, and discussing it could lead to insightful process improvements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonida
1 years ago
I think B is the least effective. Discussing team capacity is more about planning than process improvement.
upvoted 0 times
Helene
1 years ago
C) The automation tests failed frequently without any logs to help in debugging the failure reason.
upvoted 0 times
...
Penney
1 years ago
B) I agree, discussing team capacity is more about planning than process improvement.
upvoted 0 times
...
William
1 years ago
A) The build process was slow and this often caused delays waiting for the build to complete.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alyce
1 years ago
Definitely go with C. Lack of logs to debug test failures is a serious problem that needs to be addressed.
upvoted 0 times
Carol
1 years ago
B) For the last sprint the estimated and actual effort were much higher than the team capacity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amber
1 years ago
A) The build process was slow and this often caused delays waiting for the build to complete.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosita
1 years ago
B) For the last sprint the estimated and actual effort were much higher than the team capacity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maybelle
1 years ago
A) The build process was slow and this often caused delays waiting for the build to complete.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Maybelle
1 years ago
Option D is the least effective. Discussing individual team member performance should be handled privately, not in a retrospective.
upvoted 0 times
Terina
1 years ago
C) The automation tests failed frequently without any logs to help in debugging the failure reason.
upvoted 0 times
...
Earnestine
1 years ago
B) For the last sprint the estimated and actual effort were much higher than the team capacity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willodean
1 years ago
A) The build process was slow and this often caused delays waiting for the build to complete.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lisbeth
1 years ago
C) The automation tests failed frequently without any logs to help in debugging the failure reason.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oretha
1 years ago
B) For the last sprint the estimated and actual effort were much higher than the team capacity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristel
1 years ago
A) The build process was slow and this often caused delays waiting for the build to complete.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel