Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

iSQI CTAL-ATT Exam - Topic 9 Question 9 Discussion

Your organization has been making animal food dispensers for free-range chickens and has been using a combination of test automation exploratory testing and some black-box testing on all products. The company has been using the following approach to the testing of the high-risk items:Exploratory testing = 85%Black-box testing = 15%Test automation = coverage goal is 25% but time is only allocated to automation if no other testing is needed, so the coverage is currently about 5% and the automation suite is run only infrequently.The company has decided to modify their product and use it for pill dispensing for pharmacies Regardless of the mechanical challenges of this modification you now have to determine how testing should be adjusted for this safety critical application Which of the following would follow the guidelines in the syllabus for the testing approach for the high-risk items?
B) Exploratory testing = 15% Black box testing = 85% Test automation = 25%, executed for every code release
A) Exploratory testing = 85% Black-box testing = 15% Test automation = 25% coverage executed infrequently
C) Exploratory testing = 50% Black box testing = 50% Test automation = 50% coverage executed before every production release
D) Exploratory testing = 25% Black-box testing = 75% Test automation = 75% coverage executed for every code release

iSQI CTAL-ATT Exam - Topic 9 Question 9 Discussion

Actual exam question for iSQI's CTAL-ATT exam
Question #: 9
Topic #: 9
[All CTAL-ATT Questions]

Your organization has been making animal food dispensers for free-range chickens and has been using a combination of test automation exploratory testing and some black-box testing on all products. The company has been using the following approach to the testing of the high-risk items:

Exploratory testing = 85%

Black-box testing = 15%

Test automation = coverage goal is 25% but time is only allocated to automation if no other testing is needed, so the coverage is currently about 5% and the automation suite is run only infrequently.

The company has decided to modify their product and use it for pill dispensing for pharmacies Regardless of the mechanical challenges of this modification you now have to determine how testing should be adjusted for this safety critical application Which of the following would follow the guidelines in the syllabus for the testing approach for the high-risk items?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Caprice at Dec 12, 2022, 08:06 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CTAL-ATT Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Sheridan
10 months ago
I think D is overkill on automation, we need to focus on real-world testing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beatriz
10 months ago
I like option C, balanced approach with good automation coverage!
upvoted 0 times
...
Crista
10 months ago
Wait, 85% black-box testing? That seems a bit extreme for a pill dispenser.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nichelle
10 months ago
Totally agree, option B makes the most sense here!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamie
10 months ago
Seems like black-box testing should be prioritized for safety-critical apps.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleisha
11 months ago
I recall that we should prioritize thorough testing for high-risk items, so maybe option D with 75% black-box testing makes sense, but it feels like a big shift from what we practiced.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rory
11 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the automation part. Shouldn't we aim for more frequent execution if it's a safety-critical product?
upvoted 0 times
...
Domingo
11 months ago
I think we practiced a question where we had to balance exploratory and black-box testing. It feels like we should lean more towards black-box for this pill dispenser.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvie
11 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of increasing black-box testing for safety-critical applications, but I'm not sure if 85% is too high.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raylene
11 months ago
A standard greeting sounds like a good way to demonstrate the new management's control and enhance the group's reputation. I'll go with that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veda
11 months ago
I feel like MACsec could be a good fit here. It operates at Layer 2, which might help with performance, but I can't quite recall if it guarantees line-rate in all scenarios.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel