Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

iSQI CTAL-ATT Exam - Topic 9 Question 19 Discussion

Actual exam question for iSQI's CTAL-ATT exam
Question #: 19
Topic #: 9
[All CTAL-ATT Questions]

Consider the following section of pseudocode:

function getPassword() {

var x;

var y;

var z;

var passwordGood = false

// Get password from user, user is allowed 3 tries

do until x = 3

call getPassword (password)

if password is good

x = 3

passwordGood = true

else

X = X + 1

display ''Password is not valid, try again''

endif

If passwordGood <> true

display ''You exceeded the number of tries to enter a password. Your account is now locked. Call customer service.''

endif

endloop

}

For this section of code, which of the following issues should be identified during a code review?

Variables have not been properly defined with meaningful names

There are unused variables defined

Divisors are not tested for zero

Loop counters are not properly initialized

There are endless loops

There are statements within the loop that should be outside the loop

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Sheron at Jul 25, 2023, 07:44 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CTAL-ATT Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Rueben
6 months ago
Unused variables? That's surprising!
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantell
6 months ago
I think option B is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marion
7 months ago
Wait, are there really endless loops here?
upvoted 0 times
...
Franklyn
7 months ago
Totally agree, they need to be more descriptive!
upvoted 0 times
...
Carri
7 months ago
The variable names are super vague.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusa
7 months ago
I feel like there are definitely some variables that aren't being used, but I'm confused about the loop counter initialization. It seems like it should be fine.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nieves
7 months ago
I think we practiced a question similar to this, and I recall that endless loops can be a problem, so maybe option C is correct?
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleta
8 months ago
I'm not sure about the unused variables part, but I feel like there might be an issue with the loop not terminating properly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pauline
8 months ago
I remember we discussed how variable names should be meaningful, so I think option D might be right about that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Abel
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know we need to configure something to deploy apps to Android Enterprise devices, but I'm not sure if linking the Managed Google Play account is the first step. Maybe I should review the Intune documentation again to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lettie
8 months ago
This looks like a straightforward question about the properties of the Number type in JavaScript. I'll need to think carefully about the differences between the options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilbert
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I need to carefully read through the options and think about which features are specific to Service Cloud.
upvoted 0 times
...
Portia
1 year ago
Ah, the good old 'password is not valid, try again' message. Bet the user's gonna feel real confident after seeing that five times in a row. Tech support, here we come!
upvoted 0 times
Danica
12 months ago
B) 2, 3, 4, 6
upvoted 0 times
...
Zack
12 months ago
I think the issue is with the variables not having meaningful names and the loop counters not being properly initialized.
upvoted 0 times
...
Callie
12 months ago
B) 2, 3, 4, 6
upvoted 0 times
...
Jennie
12 months ago
A) 1, 3, 4, 5
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusa
12 months ago
Yeah, those variable names could use some work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Buck
1 year ago
A) 1, 3, 4, 5
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jeniffer
1 year ago
Statements outside the loop? Rookie move. That's like putting the cart before the horse. Gotta keep that logic tight, you know?
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernadine
1 year ago
Ah, the old 'loop counter not properly initialized' problem. Classic coding blunder right there. Gotta watch out for those endless loops, too!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamie
1 year ago
Wait, why are we testing for zero divisors? This is a password validation function, not a math equation. Seems a bit off the mark.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kati
1 year ago
Hmm, the variable names could definitely be more descriptive. And what's up with those unused variables? Seems like a rookie mistake to me.
upvoted 0 times
Walker
1 year ago
User2: I agree, they should have used more descriptive names.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tula
1 year ago
User1: Yeah, those variable names are really confusing.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Annett
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think option B might also be correct. It mentions unused variables and statements within the loop that should be outside the loop.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonora
1 year ago
I agree with Shanda. Option A seems to cover all the issues mentioned in the code review question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shanda
1 year ago
I think the correct answer is A) 1, 3, 4, 5 because variables should have meaningful names, divisors need to be tested for zero, loop counters should be properly initialized, and there should not be endless loops.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel