Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

iSQI Exam CTAL-ATT Topic 8 Question 53 Discussion

Actual exam question for iSQI's CTAL-ATT exam
Question #: 53
Topic #: 8
[All CTAL-ATT Questions]

You have identified existing test cases that require re-factoring, Which is the NEXT task you should perform?

SELECT ONE OPTION

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Definition of Test Automation:

Test automation is not a procedure, objective, or methodology. Instead, it is a strategic approach to automate testing activities to improve efficiency and coverage.

Strategic Nature:

The ISTQB syllabus defines test automation as a strategy that integrates automated tests into the development lifecycle.

Conclusion:

Option C is correct as test automation aligns with the definition of a strategy.


by In at Jan 24, 2025, 02:20 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CTAL-ATT Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Evelynn
15 days ago
Option D all the way! Refactoring the internal structure is like a software developer's version of feng shui - it just makes everything flow better. Plus, who doesn't love a good ol' fashioned code clean-up?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kattie
16 days ago
I'd go with Option A. Why bother with all this refactoring and impact analysis when you can just adjust the tests to match the user stories? It's like putting a bandaid on a broken leg, but hey, it might work!
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilma
18 days ago
Option B is the way to go. You need to ensure that the test results remain the same before making any changes. Otherwise, you could end up introducing new bugs. It's like checking to make sure your car is still working before you take it to the mechanic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gary
29 days ago
I'm leaning towards Option C. It's important to understand the impact of the current iteration on the existing regression tests before making any changes. That way, you can identify any potential issues early on and avoid breaking the build.
upvoted 0 times
Leonora
7 days ago
I think Option C is the best choice. It's important to analyze the impact of the current iteration on the existing regression tests.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Verdell
1 months ago
Option D seems like the logical choice here. Why change the test cases when you can just refactor the internal structure to improve maintainability? Plus, it's always a good idea to keep the observable behavior the same to avoid breaking existing functionality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katie
2 months ago
I would go with D) Make changes to the internal structure of the tests to improve maintainability. It's important to ensure the tests are easy to maintain in the long run.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brent
2 months ago
I agree with Tesha, analyzing the impact of the functionality on existing regression tests is crucial before making any changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tesha
2 months ago
I think the next task should be C) Analyze the Impact of the functionality of the current iteration on the existing regression tests.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel