Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

iSQI CSeT-F Exam - Topic 1 Question 35 Discussion

Posted by Tamar on Jul 15, 2026 at 10:43 AM

Which of the following statements is true?

Suggested Answer: B

Automating tests is generally more expensive than manual testing in terms of initial setup and development costs. However, once automated tests are created, they can be run repeatedly with minimal additional cost. In contrast, manual testing typically requires human testers to perform the same tasks repeatedly, which can be more time-consuming and expensive in the long run.

It's worth noting that creating automated scripts for every manual test is not always the cheapest and best way to automate. Automating tests that are not frequently run or that do not provide much value in terms of detecting bugs or improving product quality may not be the best use of resources. Automated tests should be selected based on the goals of the testing and the expected return on investment.

Manual testers can run tests that an automated test would lack the context to interpret, and automated test script may not excel in interpreting the context of the testing. It depends on the scenario and the automation approach.


Get Premium CSeT-F Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
12 comments · newest first
SH
Shawn 1 month ago
But D has a point too. Sometimes context is crucial for understanding test results.
EM
Emmanuel 1 month ago
I agree, B makes sense. Manual testing can be so time-consuming.
BR
Britt 1 month ago
I think option B is true. Automation costs more upfront but saves time later.
GL
Glory 2 months ago
Totally agree with B! Maintenance is way easier than manual testing.
JU
Judy 2 months ago
Really? I’m surprised by C. How can a script understand context?
QU
Quinn 2 months ago
D makes a good point. Context is key in testing!
HE
Helaine 2 months ago
I disagree with A. Not every test needs automation.
JE
Jeannetta 2 months ago
B is spot on! Automation saves time in the long run.
DA
Danica 2 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I think B makes sense since automated tests can be cheaper to maintain over time.
TR
Tracey 3 months ago
I think option D sounds right because manual testers can adapt on the fly, which automation can struggle with.
SY
Sylvie 3 months ago
I’m not sure about option C; I feel like recorded scripts often miss the nuances of the testing context.
BR
Breana 3 months ago
I remember discussing how automation can be costly upfront, but I think maintenance might save time in the long run.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel