New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

iSQI CPSA-FL Exam - Topic 3 Question 7 Discussion

Actual exam question for iSQI's CPSA-FL exam
Question #: 7
Topic #: 3
[All CPSA-FL Questions]

In a customer project the architecture shall be based on components. The requirements have not been fully determined yet.

Taking this constraint into account, which three properties of the components developed by you will you pay particular attention to? (Choose three.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C, D, E

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Hildegarde
4 months ago
Surprised that small size isn’t more emphasized!
upvoted 0 times
...
Willow
4 months ago
Wait, why is meaningful component names even a choice?
upvoted 0 times
...
Luther
4 months ago
Small component size is a must too!
upvoted 0 times
...
Stevie
4 months ago
Totally agree on open for extension!
upvoted 0 times
...
Merrilee
5 months ago
I’d definitely go for weak coupling and strong cohesion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheridan
5 months ago
I feel like meaningful component names could help with clarity, but I’m torn between that and open for extension.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think strong cohesion is also crucial for components to function well together, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Merilyn
5 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of weak coupling in our last study session, especially when requirements are unclear.
upvoted 0 times
...
Boris
5 months ago
I practiced a similar question where small component size was emphasized, but I wonder if it’s as important here given the requirements are still evolving.
upvoted 0 times
...
Martha
5 months ago
I've used the find command a lot, and I'm confident the answer is -maxdepth. That's the go-to option for limiting the search depth when you don't want to traverse the entire directory tree.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luis
5 months ago
I'm pretty confident that the correct answer is A. Sending an updated privacy notice to an individual's personal email address would be considered direct marketing of personal data, which is regulated under the European data protection framework. The other examples don't seem to involve the same level of personal information usage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentin
5 months ago
I remember reading about this, and I believe it's not really supported to create a Read Replica from another Read Replica at all.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beckie
5 months ago
I have a vague memory of a similar topic, and I think you might be able to deactivate from the CDN as well, but it's probably not the main step in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel