Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ISM Exam LEAD Topic 5 Question 19 Discussion

Actual exam question for ISM's LEAD exam
Question #: 19
Topic #: 5
[All LEAD Questions]

CDE, Inc. designates a team comprised of finance and procurement professionals to develop and implement a "No PO/No Pay'' policy for the organization. The goal is for the firm to have 100% purchase order (PO) usage. The team spends twelve months re-structuring processes, defining metrics, and conducting employee training sessions on the policy. However, six months after launch, the level of PO adoption shows only a modest increase from 9% to 12%. Which of the following could the team have done to BEST ensure greater success in this initiative?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

ISO 14001 Compliance: ISO 14001 requires organizations to have an Environmental Management System (EMS) with clear, measurable objectives and targets.

Concern with Subjectivity: Targets and goals that are subjective and non-quantifiable do not meet ISO 14001 requirements, as they cannot be objectively measured or audited for compliance.

Importance of Quantifiable Goals: Clear, quantifiable targets allow for proper monitoring, measurement, and continuous improvement, which are core components of ISO 14001.

Reference: The ISO 14001 standard itself and environmental management literature, such as 'ISO 14001 Environmental Management Systems: An Easy-to-Use Guide' by Brian J. Gallant, emphasize the need for specific, measurable, and objective targets in an EMS.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Ruby
20 days ago
I bet the 'No PO/No Pay' policy also applies to the project team's paychecks. Talk about motivation!
upvoted 0 times
...
Elza
21 days ago
Wait, they spent a whole year on this and still only got a 3% increase? Talk about a 'No-Show' policy!
upvoted 0 times
...
Chanel
26 days ago
More robust training? Ain't nobody got time for that! This is a classic case of overthinking it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosina
1 months ago
Twelve months seems like plenty of time to get this right, but I guess the devil's in the details. Maybe they should have scaled the target goal more gradually.
upvoted 0 times
Loreta
3 days ago
A) Included stakeholders on the initial project team to foster buy-in and promote ownership
upvoted 0 times
...
Martina
9 days ago
D) Spent more time developing the policy, re-structuring related processes, and defining metrics
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamika
15 days ago
C) Offered more robust training prior to launch to make it easier for end-users to adapt to the change
upvoted 0 times
...
Kindra
19 days ago
A) Included stakeholders on the initial project team to foster buy-in and promote ownership
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Onita
2 months ago
Maybe they should have also offered more robust training before launching the policy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sang
2 months ago
Hmm, I think including stakeholders from the start would have been the way to go. Buy-in is crucial for a policy change like this.
upvoted 0 times
Felix
1 months ago
D) Spent more time developing the policy, re-structuring related processes, and defining metrics
upvoted 0 times
...
Marguerita
1 months ago
A) Included stakeholders on the initial project team to foster buy-in and promote ownership
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeanice
1 months ago
C) Offered more robust training prior to launch to make it easier for end-users to adapt to the change
upvoted 0 times
...
Naomi
1 months ago
A) Included stakeholders on the initial project team to foster buy-in and promote ownership
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Renea
2 months ago
I agree with Tu. Getting buy-in early on is crucial for success.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tu
2 months ago
I think the team should have included stakeholders from the beginning.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel