Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ISM LEAD Exam - Topic 3 Question 43 Discussion

Posted by Fatima on Aug 15, 2026 at 02:20 PM

A supply manager conducts an audit of a supplier for a proprietary material and finds safety deficiencies in the supplier's plant. Which of the following is the FIRST course of action the supply manager should take?

Suggested Answer: C

When a supply manager finds safety deficiencies in a supplier's plant, the first step should be to collaborate with the supplier to improve the working conditions. This approach is aligned with leadership and transformation management principles that emphasize building long-term, mutually beneficial relationships with suppliers. Working with the supplier fosters trust and cooperation, ensuring that both parties are committed to achieving safety standards and improving overall operations. Reference from leadership documents highlight the importance of supporting suppliers in meeting compliance requirements and enhancing their capabilities, which ultimately strengthens the entire supply chain. This method is preferred over immediately seeking alternatives or enforcing penalties, as it prioritizes continuous improvement and partnership development.


Get Premium LEAD Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
17 comments · newest first
MA
Malcolm 5 days ago
But what if they can't fix it? A might be safer.
NI
Nickolas 10 days ago
Agreed, B makes sense. They need a chance to fix it.
AG
Agustin 15 days ago
I think B is the best choice. Notify them first.
LO
Lovetta 20 days ago
Really? I’m surprised they’d give the supplier a whole month to fix it!
JU
Julene 25 days ago
Wait, why not just go straight to D? Seems safer!
PA
Paris 1 month ago
A substitute product might not be feasible right away.
TY
Tyisha 1 month ago
I think C could work too, but it depends on the severity.
KE
Kenneth 1 month ago
Definitely B, they need to know about the breach first.
IN
India 2 months ago
Not sure if giving them 30 days is enough time...
TA
Tamar 2 months ago
B is the right move, they need a chance to fix it.
GL
Glory 2 months ago
Surprised that sourcing a substitute isn't the first step!
BE
Bernardine 2 months ago
I think C makes more sense, collaboration is key.
CL
Clemencia 2 months ago
Definitely B, gotta notify them first!
GE
Gerardo 2 months ago
I feel like option C might be the best choice since it shows we want to collaborate, but I also see the risk in that. I need to think more about the implications of each option.
OC
Octavio 3 months ago
I'm a bit confused about whether we should give the supplier a chance to fix things or just start looking for alternatives right away. I guess it depends on how serious the safety issues are.
AR
Armando 3 months ago
I remember a similar question where we had to decide between notifying the supplier or finding a substitute. I think working with them to improve conditions could be a good approach too, but I'm leaning towards option B.
KE
Kenneth 3 months ago
I think the first step should be to notify the supplier about the deficiencies. It seems like option B makes the most sense, but I'm not entirely sure.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel