Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ISM INTE Exam - Topic 3 Question 5 Discussion

Posted by Lenna on Jul 05, 2024 at 05:29 AM

A supplier with a previously good performance record has recently been shipping parts with a number of flaws, making them unusable for production. The firm's supply manager would like to resolve these problems before taking more drastic measures. Which of the following actions should the supply manager take FIRST'

Suggested Answer: A

When a previously reliable supplier starts delivering flawed parts, the first step should be to ex-plore possible root causes. This approach helps in identifying any recent changes in the supplier's production processes, materials, or workforce that might be contributing to the quality issues. By understanding the root cause, the supply manager can work with the supplier to implement correc-tive actions, ensuring long-term solutions rather than temporary fixes. This collaborative approach also maintains a good relationship with the supplier and encourages continuous improvement. Reference:

* Monczka, R. M., Handfield, R. B., Giunipero, L. C., & Patterson, J. L. (2015). Purchasing and Supply Chain Management. Cengage Learning.

* Burt, D. N., Petcavag


Get Premium INTE Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
31 comments · newest first
TU
Tuyet 11 months ago
C sounds good too, but we need to talk to the supplier first!
ED
Edelmira 11 months ago
Relaxing tolerances might just mask the real issue, not fix it.
MA
Mauricio 12 months ago
Wait, are we sure the supplier's changes are the problem?
SE
Serina 12 months ago
Totally agree, we need to find the root cause first!
KR
Kristofer 1 year ago
A seems like the best first step to understand the issue.
MA
Malissa 1 year ago
Re-working the parts seems risky. I feel like we should focus on communication with the supplier first before incurring extra costs.
CL
Clare 1 year ago
Testing the parts at an independent lab sounds like a solid option, but I wonder if that might delay addressing the issue with the supplier directly.
JA
Jacqueline 1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember a practice question where we had to consider the implications of relaxing specifications. That might not be the best first move.
AG
Agustin 1 year ago
I think the first step should be to explore the root causes. It makes sense to understand what changed with the supplier's processes.
KA
Karon 1 year ago
If the parts are truly unusable, I'd be inclined to test them independently and notify the supplier. That way, we have clear evidence to work from in resolving the issue.
JI
Jimmie 1 year ago
The key here is to identify the underlying problem before taking action. Exploring the root causes, as option A suggests, seems like the logical first step to me.
MA
Mammie 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure which option to choose here. Should I focus on the supplier's processes or try to work around the issue internally? I'll need to think this through carefully.
YO
Yoko 1 year ago
This seems like a straightforward supply chain issue. I'd start by exploring the root causes, as that's likely to provide the most insight into resolving the problem.
CA
Carri 1 year ago
Okay, let's see here. The question is asking for the two reasons a Solution Architect should use to justify the recommendation of Digital Engagement features. I think the key is to identify the limitations of the existing tools mentioned and how Digital Engagement can address those.
VA
Vanesa 1 year ago
This seems like a straightforward question about the tax treatment of awards and grants. I'll need to carefully review the conditions outlined in the question to determine which one(s) must be met for the award to be excluded from Kent's gross income.
AS
Ashlyn 2 years ago
Reworking the parts in-house and billing the supplier should be the last resort to avoid damaging the relationship.
TR
Trevor 2 years ago
I believe testing the parts at an independent laboratory is also important to gather more information.
FR
Frank 2 years ago
Haha, D? Reworking and billing the supplier? That's like putting a band-aid on a broken leg. Gotta dig deeper here.
KA
Kasandra 2 years ago
I agree with Tijuana, finding the root cause is crucial to solving the issue.
WI
Wilda 2 years ago
B is a Band-Aid solution. We need to address the real issue, not just relax specs. A is the way to go to fix this long-term.
SH
Shaniqua 2 years ago
↳ replying to Wilda
C) Testing the parts independently can also provide valuable information for the supplier
IN
India 2 years ago
↳ replying to Wilda
A) Once we know the root cause, we can work on a permanent solution
PO
Pok 2 years ago
↳ replying to Wilda
B) I agree, we need to get to the bottom of this issue with the supplier
RA
Rasheeda 2 years ago
↳ replying to Wilda
A) Explore possible root causes, including changes in the supplier's production processes
CE
Cecilia 2 years ago
Hmm, I'd go with C. Testing the parts independently will give us hard evidence to show the supplier. They can't argue with the results.
JO
Jonelle 2 years ago
↳ replying to Cecilia
C) Test the parts at an independent laboratory and notify the supplier of the results
CY
Cyndy 2 years ago
↳ replying to Cecilia
A) Explore possible root causes, including changes in the supplier's production processes
TI
Tijuana 2 years ago
I think the supply manager should explore possible root causes first.
ER
Erinn 2 years ago
A seems like the best option to get to the root of the problem. Can't just jump to reworking or testing without understanding what changed on the supplier's end.
EL
Elli 2 years ago
↳ replying to Erinn
Definitely, jumping to reworking or testing without knowing the root cause could be a waste of time and resources.
EV
Eveline 2 years ago
↳ replying to Erinn
I agree, we need to figure out what's causing the issues first.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel