Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ISM Exam INTE Topic 1 Question 19 Discussion

Actual exam question for ISM's INTE exam
Question #: 19
Topic #: 1
[All INTE Questions]

A supply manager for a U.S. firm is tasked with negotiating domestic shipping terms. The terms must ensure that the supplier has liability for any damaged products and is responsible for filing any claims with the shipper. The terms must also allow the buying firm to pay the shipper directly for shipping costs. Which of the following will BEST accomplish this objective?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Implementing a reverse supply chain requires first defining a consistent return process that can be integrated into the existing forward supply chain. This ensures that all franchisees follow the same procedures for handling returns, which enhances efficiency, customer satisfaction, and potentially reduces costs. Standardizing the return process also allows for better tracking and management of returned goods, improving overall supply chain performance. By addressing this foundational step first, MNO, Inc. can ensure a smoother implementation of the reverse supply chain. Reference:

* Rogers, D. S., & Tibben-Lembke, R. (2001). An Examination of Reverse Logistics Practic-es. Journal of Business Logistics, 22(2), 129-148.

* Blanchard, D. (2010). Supply Chain Management Best Practices. John Wiley & Sons.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Albina
1 months ago
Personally, I'd go with option A. It just seems the most logical choice, you know? What do you think, should we grab a coffee after the exam and discuss it further? I'm buying, of course.
upvoted 0 times
Keva
19 days ago
That sounds like a good choice. I agree with you.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isabella
20 days ago
A) FOB Origin, Freight Allowed
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lina
1 months ago
I'm going with option B, FOB Origin, Freight Collect. It just seems the most straightforward to me. The supplier is liable, and the buying firm can pay the shipper directly. Easy peasy, lemon squeezy!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaime
1 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Option D, FOB Destination, Freight Prepaid, could work too. The supplier is responsible for the shipping, and the buying firm doesn't have to worry about it. But then again, I'm not the shipping expert here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilberto
1 months ago
Option C, FOB Destination, Freight Collect, seems like the way to go. The supplier is liable for any damage, and the buying firm can still pay the shipper directly. It's a win-win!
upvoted 0 times
...
Madonna
2 months ago
I think option A, FOB Origin, Freight Allowed, is the best choice here. The supplier is responsible for the products until they're delivered, and the buying firm can pay the shipper directly for the shipping costs.
upvoted 0 times
Glory
19 days ago
I think option D, FOB Destination, Freight Prepaid, would be better. The buying firm can have more control over the shipping process and costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emmanuel
1 months ago
I agree, option A is the best choice. It ensures the supplier has liability for any damaged products and allows the buying firm to pay the shipper directly.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sheldon
2 months ago
That's a good point, Maryann. Option D does make it easier for the buying firm to handle shipping costs directly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryann
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe option D) FOB Destination, Freight Prepaid is better because the buying firm can pay the shipper directly for shipping costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheldon
2 months ago
I think the best option is A) FOB Origin, Freight Allowed because the supplier will have liability for damaged products and can file claims with the shipper.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel