New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ISC2 SSCP Exam - Topic 7 Question 80 Discussion

Actual exam question for ISC2's SSCP exam
Question #: 80
Topic #: 7
[All SSCP Questions]

What is defined as inference of information from other, intermediate, relevant facts?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

A trojan horse is any code that appears to have some useful purpose but also contains code that has a malicious or harmful purpose imbedded in it. A Trojan often also includes a trapdoor as a means to gain access to a computer system bypassing security controls.

Wikipedia defines it as:

A Trojan horse, or Trojan, in computing is a non-self-replicating type of malware program containing malicious code that, when executed, carries out actions determined by the nature of the Trojan, typically causing loss or theft of data, and possible system harm. The term is derived from the story of the wooden horse used to trick defenders of Troy into taking concealed warriors into their city in ancient Greece, because computer Trojans often employ a form of social engineering, presenting themselves as routine, useful, or interesting in order to persuade victims to install them on their computers.

The following answers are incorrect:

virus. Is incorrect because a Virus is a malicious program and is does not appear to be harmless, it's sole purpose is malicious intent often doing damage to a system. A computer virus is a type of malware that, when executed, replicates by inserting copies of itself (possibly modified) into other computer programs, data files, or the boot sector of the hard drive; when this replication succeeds, the affected areas are then said to be 'infected'.

worm. Is incorrect because a Worm is similiar to a Virus but does not require user intervention to execute. Rather than doing damage to the system, worms tend to self-propagate and devour the resources of a system. A computer worm is a standalone malware computer program that replicates itself in order to spread to other computers. Often, it uses a computer network to spread itself, relying on security failures on the target computer to access it. Unlike a computer virus, it does not need to attach itself to an existing program. Worms almost always cause at least some harm to the network, even if only by consuming bandwidth, whereas viruses almost always corrupt or modify files on a targeted computer.

trapdoor. Is incorrect because a trapdoor is a means to bypass security by hiding an entry point into a system. Trojan Horses often have a trapdoor imbedded in them.

References:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trojan_horse_%28computing%29

and

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_virus

and

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_worm

and

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Backdoor_%28computing%29


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Timothy
3 months ago
Hearsay evidence is more about what others say, not this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
3 months ago
Wait, are we sure about that? Sounds off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jame
3 months ago
Totally agree, it's all about the context!
upvoted 0 times
...
Alease
4 months ago
I thought it was secondary evidence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Curt
4 months ago
It's definitely circumstantial evidence!
upvoted 0 times
...
Cyril
4 months ago
I'm leaning towards circumstantial evidence too, but I wish I could remember the exact details from our notes!
upvoted 0 times
...
Katy
4 months ago
Hearsay evidence seems off for this question. I feel like we had a similar question, and the answer was different.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlene
4 months ago
I remember discussing secondary evidence, but I don't think it fits the definition here. Maybe it's circumstantial evidence?
upvoted 0 times
...
Stacey
5 months ago
I think this might be about circumstantial evidence, but I'm not entirely sure. It sounds familiar from our last practice session.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arletta
5 months ago
I think the answer is D, circumstantial evidence. That's when you draw conclusions based on indirect evidence, rather than direct proof. Feels like the best fit for the question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Polly
5 months ago
Ugh, I'm really struggling with this one. Is it C, hearsay evidence? Or maybe B, conclusive evidence? I wish I could remember the definitions better. Guess I need to review my notes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elroy
5 months ago
Okay, let me see if I can break this down. The question is asking about inferring information from other facts, so that sounds like circumstantial evidence to me. I'm going to go with D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelaide
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm not totally sure about this one. Is it D, circumstantial evidence? Or could it be A, secondary evidence? I'll have to think it through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beckie
5 months ago
This one seems straightforward - I think the answer is D, circumstantial evidence. That's when you infer information from other relevant facts, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Pa
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused about the storage account locations and how that relates to the Azure SQL database location. I'll need to double-check the requirements for the auditing destination to make sure I understand this correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evelynn
5 months ago
I remember learning about the vEdge2000 supporting LTE and Wi-Fi, so I'm confident that's the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Miesha
5 months ago
This seems like a straightforward management evaluation question. I'll carefully read through the options and try to identify the key factors they're looking for.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catalina
5 months ago
Honestly, I'm a bit confused about the order of priorities. I thought understanding the risk tolerance was essential right from the start.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merilyn
9 months ago
Circumstantial evidence for the win! Though, I wonder if the cat has an alibi...
upvoted 0 times
Avery
8 months ago
True, that could make or break the case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Toi
8 months ago
But we still need to find out if the cat has an alibi.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lisha
8 months ago
Yeah, it's all about connecting the dots.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blair
8 months ago
I think it's circumstantial evidence.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Francis
9 months ago
Gotta be D, guys. Circumstantial evidence is the way to infer information from other facts. Although, I did hear a rumor that the cat did it...
upvoted 0 times
...
Evangelina
9 months ago
D, no doubt. Circumstantial evidence is where it's at. Sherlock Holmes would be proud of this question.
upvoted 0 times
Terrilyn
8 months ago
Definitely, sometimes the smallest details can lead to big revelations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Precious
9 months ago
Yeah, it's all about connecting the dots and drawing conclusions from the facts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusa
9 months ago
I agree, circumstantial evidence can be very powerful in solving cases.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Glory
10 months ago
Definitely D. Circumstantial evidence is the way to go. I can't believe they're even trying to trick us with those other options.
upvoted 0 times
Corazon
9 months ago
Yeah, it's all about connecting the dots with the facts we have.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quinn
9 months ago
I agree, circumstantial evidence is key in making inferences.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ben
10 months ago
Yeah, they're trying to throw us off with those other options, but D is the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chery
10 months ago
I agree, circumstantial evidence is definitely the key here.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Herschel
10 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think it could also be A) Secondary evidence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Loren
11 months ago
Hmm, I think D) Circumstantial evidence is the correct answer here. It's all about piecing together the clues to draw a conclusion.
upvoted 0 times
Lucille
9 months ago
Yeah, secondary evidence is like backup information to support the main facts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stanford
9 months ago
Conclusive evidence would be more solid and definitive, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
9 months ago
I think it's different from hearsay evidence, which is based on what someone else said.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cora
10 months ago
I agree, circumstantial evidence is all about connecting the dots.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Edelmira
11 months ago
I agree with Lizbeth, Circumstantial evidence makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lizbeth
11 months ago
I think it's D) Circumstantial evidence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alison
11 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think it might be A) Secondary evidence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sarah
11 months ago
I agree with Virgina, Circumstantial evidence makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgina
11 months ago
I think it's D) Circumstantial evidence.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel