Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ISC2 SSCP Exam - Topic 7 Question 80 Discussion

Posted by Jenelle on Dec 21, 2023 at 06:38 PM

What is defined as inference of information from other, intermediate, relevant facts?

Suggested Answer: C

A trojan horse is any code that appears to have some useful purpose but also contains code that has a malicious or harmful purpose imbedded in it. A Trojan often also includes a trapdoor as a means to gain access to a computer system bypassing security controls.

Wikipedia defines it as:

A Trojan horse, or Trojan, in computing is a non-self-replicating type of malware program containing malicious code that, when executed, carries out actions determined by the nature of the Trojan, typically causing loss or theft of data, and possible system harm. The term is derived from the story of the wooden horse used to trick defenders of Troy into taking concealed warriors into their city in ancient Greece, because computer Trojans often employ a form of social engineering, presenting themselves as routine, useful, or interesting in order to persuade victims to install them on their computers.

The following answers are incorrect:

virus. Is incorrect because a Virus is a malicious program and is does not appear to be harmless, it's sole purpose is malicious intent often doing damage to a system. A computer virus is a type of malware that, when executed, replicates by inserting copies of itself (possibly modified) into other computer programs, data files, or the boot sector of the hard drive; when this replication succeeds, the affected areas are then said to be 'infected'.

worm. Is incorrect because a Worm is similiar to a Virus but does not require user intervention to execute. Rather than doing damage to the system, worms tend to self-propagate and devour the resources of a system. A computer worm is a standalone malware computer program that replicates itself in order to spread to other computers. Often, it uses a computer network to spread itself, relying on security failures on the target computer to access it. Unlike a computer virus, it does not need to attach itself to an existing program. Worms almost always cause at least some harm to the network, even if only by consuming bandwidth, whereas viruses almost always corrupt or modify files on a targeted computer.

trapdoor. Is incorrect because a trapdoor is a means to bypass security by hiding an entry point into a system. Trojan Horses often have a trapdoor imbedded in them.

References:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trojan_horse_%28computing%29

and

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_virus

and

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_worm

and

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Backdoor_%28computing%29


Get Premium SSCP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
44 comments · newest first
TI
Timothy 10 months ago
Hearsay evidence is more about what others say, not this.
QU
Quentin 11 months ago
Wait, are we sure about that? Sounds off.
JA
Jame 11 months ago
Totally agree, it's all about the context!
AL
Alease 11 months ago
I thought it was secondary evidence.
CU
Curt 11 months ago
It's definitely circumstantial evidence!
CY
Cyril 12 months ago
I'm leaning towards circumstantial evidence too, but I wish I could remember the exact details from our notes!
KA
Katy 12 months ago
Hearsay evidence seems off for this question. I feel like we had a similar question, and the answer was different.
CH
Charlene 12 months ago
I remember discussing secondary evidence, but I don't think it fits the definition here. Maybe it's circumstantial evidence?
ST
Stacey 1 year ago
I think this might be about circumstantial evidence, but I'm not entirely sure. It sounds familiar from our last practice session.
AR
Arletta 1 year ago
I think the answer is D, circumstantial evidence. That's when you draw conclusions based on indirect evidence, rather than direct proof. Feels like the best fit for the question.
PO
Polly 1 year ago
Ugh, I'm really struggling with this one. Is it C, hearsay evidence? Or maybe B, conclusive evidence? I wish I could remember the definitions better. Guess I need to review my notes.
EL
Elroy 1 year ago
Okay, let me see if I can break this down. The question is asking about inferring information from other facts, so that sounds like circumstantial evidence to me. I'm going to go with D.
AD
Adelaide 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not totally sure about this one. Is it D, circumstantial evidence? Or could it be A, secondary evidence? I'll have to think it through carefully.
BE
Beckie 1 year ago
This one seems straightforward - I think the answer is D, circumstantial evidence. That's when you infer information from other relevant facts, right?
PA
Pa 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused about the storage account locations and how that relates to the Azure SQL database location. I'll need to double-check the requirements for the auditing destination to make sure I understand this correctly.
EV
Evelynn 1 year ago
I remember learning about the vEdge2000 supporting LTE and Wi-Fi, so I'm confident that's the right answer.
MI
Miesha 1 year ago
This seems like a straightforward management evaluation question. I'll carefully read through the options and try to identify the key factors they're looking for.
CA
Catalina 1 year ago
Honestly, I'm a bit confused about the order of priorities. I thought understanding the risk tolerance was essential right from the start.
ME
Merilyn 1 year ago
Circumstantial evidence for the win! Though, I wonder if the cat has an alibi...
AV
Avery 1 year ago
↳ replying to Merilyn
True, that could make or break the case.
TO
Toi 1 year ago
↳ replying to Merilyn
But we still need to find out if the cat has an alibi.
LI
Lisha 1 year ago
↳ replying to Merilyn
Yeah, it's all about connecting the dots.
BL
Blair 1 year ago
↳ replying to Merilyn
I think it's circumstantial evidence.
FR
Francis 1 year ago
Gotta be D, guys. Circumstantial evidence is the way to infer information from other facts. Although, I did hear a rumor that the cat did it...
EV
Evangelina 1 year ago
D, no doubt. Circumstantial evidence is where it's at. Sherlock Holmes would be proud of this question.
TE
Terrilyn 1 year ago
↳ replying to Evangelina
Definitely, sometimes the smallest details can lead to big revelations.
PR
Precious 1 year ago
↳ replying to Evangelina
Yeah, it's all about connecting the dots and drawing conclusions from the facts.
JE
Jesusa 1 year ago
↳ replying to Evangelina
I agree, circumstantial evidence can be very powerful in solving cases.
GL
Glory 1 year ago
Definitely D. Circumstantial evidence is the way to go. I can't believe they're even trying to trick us with those other options.
CO
Corazon 1 year ago
↳ replying to Glory
Yeah, it's all about connecting the dots with the facts we have.
QU
Quinn 1 year ago
↳ replying to Glory
I agree, circumstantial evidence is key in making inferences.
BE
Ben 1 year ago
↳ replying to Glory
Yeah, they're trying to throw us off with those other options, but D is the right choice.
CH
Chery 1 year ago
↳ replying to Glory
I agree, circumstantial evidence is definitely the key here.
HE
Herschel 1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think it could also be A) Secondary evidence.
LO
Loren 2 years ago
Hmm, I think D) Circumstantial evidence is the correct answer here. It's all about piecing together the clues to draw a conclusion.
LU
Lucille 1 year ago
↳ replying to Loren
Yeah, secondary evidence is like backup information to support the main facts.
ST
Stanford 1 year ago
↳ replying to Loren
Conclusive evidence would be more solid and definitive, right?
IZ
Izetta 1 year ago
↳ replying to Loren
I think it's different from hearsay evidence, which is based on what someone else said.
CO
Cora 1 year ago
↳ replying to Loren
I agree, circumstantial evidence is all about connecting the dots.
ED
Edelmira 2 years ago
I agree with Lizbeth, Circumstantial evidence makes sense.
LI
Lizbeth 2 years ago
I think it's D) Circumstantial evidence.
AL
Alison 2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think it might be A) Secondary evidence.
SA
Sarah 2 years ago
I agree with Virgina, Circumstantial evidence makes sense.
VI
Virgina 2 years ago
I think it's D) Circumstantial evidence.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel