Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ISC2 SSCP Exam - Topic 5 Question 75 Discussion

Posted by Virgina on Sep 04, 2023 at 08:38 AM

Related to information security, availability is the opposite of which of the following?

Suggested Answer: C

A trojan horse is any code that appears to have some useful purpose but also contains code that has a malicious or harmful purpose imbedded in it. A Trojan often also includes a trapdoor as a means to gain access to a computer system bypassing security controls.

Wikipedia defines it as:

A Trojan horse, or Trojan, in computing is a non-self-replicating type of malware program containing malicious code that, when executed, carries out actions determined by the nature of the Trojan, typically causing loss or theft of data, and possible system harm. The term is derived from the story of the wooden horse used to trick defenders of Troy into taking concealed warriors into their city in ancient Greece, because computer Trojans often employ a form of social engineering, presenting themselves as routine, useful, or interesting in order to persuade victims to install them on their computers.

The following answers are incorrect:

virus. Is incorrect because a Virus is a malicious program and is does not appear to be harmless, it's sole purpose is malicious intent often doing damage to a system. A computer virus is a type of malware that, when executed, replicates by inserting copies of itself (possibly modified) into other computer programs, data files, or the boot sector of the hard drive; when this replication succeeds, the affected areas are then said to be 'infected'.

worm. Is incorrect because a Worm is similiar to a Virus but does not require user intervention to execute. Rather than doing damage to the system, worms tend to self-propagate and devour the resources of a system. A computer worm is a standalone malware computer program that replicates itself in order to spread to other computers. Often, it uses a computer network to spread itself, relying on security failures on the target computer to access it. Unlike a computer virus, it does not need to attach itself to an existing program. Worms almost always cause at least some harm to the network, even if only by consuming bandwidth, whereas viruses almost always corrupt or modify files on a targeted computer.

trapdoor. Is incorrect because a trapdoor is a means to bypass security by hiding an entry point into a system. Trojan Horses often have a trapdoor imbedded in them.

References:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trojan_horse_%28computing%29

and

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_virus

and

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_worm

and

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Backdoor_%28computing%29


Get Premium SSCP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
39 comments · newest first
KA
Karl 11 months ago
Nope, definitely destruction!
CA
Carissa 11 months ago
I thought it might be related to documentation.
AL
Aleta 11 months ago
Wait, is it really just that simple?
KA
Kami 11 months ago
Totally agree, that makes sense!
JE
Jennifer 12 months ago
Availability is the opposite of destruction.
SY
Sylvia 12 months ago
I feel confused about this one. I thought availability was about access, but I'm not sure how that relates to the options given.
HE
Herminia 12 months ago
I practiced a question like this, and I think availability contrasts with something that limits access. Destruction sounds plausible.
EL
Elenor 1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about availability being linked to access. Could it be delegation?
VI
Vi 1 year ago
I think availability is related to keeping systems up and running, so maybe it's the opposite of destruction?
AM
Amber 1 year ago
I've got this one! The opposite of availability must be destruction. If information is not available, then it has been destroyed or made inaccessible. Confident in this answer.
CA
Caprice 1 year ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. Is the opposite of availability really destruction? That doesn't seem quite right to me. I'll have to review my notes on the CIA triad to make sure I'm understanding this correctly.
SH
Sherly 1 year ago
Okay, let's see. Availability is the opposite of... destruction, that's got to be it. The question is asking about the opposite, and destruction seems like the clear choice here.
UL
Ulysses 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not totally sure about this one. I know availability is one of the key principles of information security, but I'm having trouble remembering what the opposite would be. I'll have to think this through carefully.
TH
Theola 1 year ago
This one seems straightforward. Availability is about ensuring information is accessible, so the opposite must be destruction.
DI
Dianne 1 year ago
I'm pretty sure the "from" header is one of the key criteria, since that's where the domain information is typically found. But I'm not sure about the other one.
RO
Rosalyn 1 year ago
The key here is to focus on the main sources of information and advice that would help a help desk become a model of best practice. I think Knowledge Centred Support is the way to go.
MA
Margart 1 year ago
Availability is the antithesis of destruction, my friends. If your data isn't available, it might as well not exist at all. D) destruction is the way to go.
JA
Jaclyn 1 year ago
Haha, this is an easy one. Availability is the opposite of destruction - you don't want your precious data getting obliterated, do you? D) all the way!
RO
Roslyn 1 year ago
I'm pretty sure the answer is D) destruction. Availability is all about ensuring data and systems are accessible, not being destroyed.
JE
Jeanice 1 year ago
↳ replying to Roslyn
So, the opposite of availability would be destruction then.
CL
Clorinda 1 year ago
↳ replying to Roslyn
Yeah, it's more about making sure data and systems are accessible when needed.
LA
Lavonna 1 year ago
↳ replying to Roslyn
I think you're right, availability is definitely not about destruction.
GE
Georgene 1 year ago
↳ replying to Roslyn
Yes, that makes sense. Destruction would prevent access to data and systems.
LE
Leeann 1 year ago
↳ replying to Roslyn
So, the opposite of availability would be destruction then.
RE
Rebbeca 1 year ago
↳ replying to Roslyn
I agree, it's more about making sure data and systems are accessible when needed.
WE
Wenona 1 year ago
↳ replying to Roslyn
I think you're right, availability is definitely not about destruction.
GE
Geoffrey 1 year ago
Well, the correct answer is clearly D) destruction. Availability and destruction are like night and day in information security.
JA
Jamal 1 year ago
↳ replying to Geoffrey
Well, the correct answer is clearly D) destruction. Availability and destruction are like night and day in information security.
AL
Alaine 1 year ago
↳ replying to Geoffrey
D) destruction
YO
Yolando 1 year ago
↳ replying to Geoffrey
C) documentation
HA
Haley 1 year ago
↳ replying to Geoffrey
B) distribution
WI
Winfred 1 year ago
↳ replying to Geoffrey
A) delegation
BA
Barrett 1 year ago
Hmm, availability is the opposite of destruction, not delegation or distribution. Sounds like a trick question to me!
DA
Darrin 1 year ago
↳ replying to Barrett
That's true, we need to protect against destruction to ensure availability.
SH
Sherell 1 year ago
↳ replying to Barrett
Yeah, it's important to make sure data is available and not destroyed.
AL
Alton 1 year ago
↳ replying to Barrett
I think you're right, availability is definitely the opposite of destruction.
MA
Martha 2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think it's C) documentation because availability is about making information accessible.
EA
Earleen 2 years ago
I agree with Osvaldo, availability is the opposite of destruction.
OS
Osvaldo 2 years ago
I think the answer is D) destruction.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel